This single-case design meta-analysis examined the effects of self-management (SM) strategies on academic engagement in autistic students. Prior meta-analyses reported positive outcomes but did not account for the nested structure of single-case designs. Using multilevel modeling, we addressed this limitation and examined moderators of implementation practices. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English, school-based, included at least one autistic participant, used a single-case design with a baseline and intervention phase, employed time intervals for SM, and targeted positive outcomes. We searched ProQuest, EBSCO, and Web of Science through March 10, 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the SCD RoB tool. 14 studies (29 participants) met inclusion criteria; SM increased academic engagement by 49.87% (SE = 4.33, 95% CI = [39.76, 59.59], p < .001). Variability existed across participants and studies, with 9 studies (17 participants) contributing to moderator analyses. Classroom subject, classroom type, technology-based prompting, and the time interval of SM did not significantly explain variability. Limitations include small sample sizes, exclusion of three studies due to missing information, and high risk of bias in assessors’ knowledge of study phase. Overall, SM has the potential of being a flexible strategy supporting autistic students’ academic engagement.
AdamsD.StainerM. J.SimpsonK.PaynterJ.WesterveldM. F. (2025). Profiles and longitudinal growth trajectories of teacher-rated academic skills and enablers in autistic children and adolescents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06186-1
Bangert-DrownsR. L.PykeC. (2001). A taxonomy of student engagement with educational software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic text. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.2190/0CKM-FKTR-0CPF-JLGR
4.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
5.
*BeckmanA. K.MasonB. A.WillsH. P.Garrison-KaneL.HuffmanJ. M. (2019). Improving behavioral and academic outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder: Testing an app-based self-monitoring intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 42(2), 225–244. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26623055. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2019.0011
6.
BohlmannN. L.DownerJ. T. (2016). Self-regulation and task engagement as predictors of emergent language and literacy skills. Early Education and Development, 27(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1046784
7.
BrieschA. M.DanielsB.BenevilleM. (2018). Unpacking the term “self-management”: Understanding intervention applications within the school-based literature. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9303-1
8.
*CallahanK.RademacherJ. (1999). Using self-management strategies to increase the on-task behavior of a student with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830079900100206
9.
CarnahanC.Musti-RaoS.BaileyJ. (2009). Promoting active engagement in small group learning experiences for students with autism and significant learning needs. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0047
10.
CarrM. E.MooreD. W.AndersonA. (2014). Self-management interventions on students with autism: A meta-analysis of single-subject research. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914532235
11.
ChenL.AbramsD. A.Rosenberg-LeeM.IuculanoT.WakemanH. N.PrathapS.ChenT.MenonV. (2019). Quantitative analysis of heterogeneity in academic achievement of children with autism. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(2), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618809353
12.
ChiaG. L. C.AndersonA.McLeanL. A. (2018). Use of technology to support self-management in individuals with autism: Systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0129-5
13.
*CihakD. F.WrightR.AyresK. M. (2010). Use of self-modeling static-picture prompts via a handheld computer to facilitate self-monitoring in the general education classroom. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(1), 136–149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880157. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471004500112
14.
*ClemonsL. L.MasonB. A.Garrison-KaneL.WillsH. P. (2015). Self-monitoring for high school students with disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715596134
EstesA.RiveraV.BryanM.CaliP. W.DawsonG. (2010). Discrepancies between academic achievement and intellectual ability in higher-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1127-3
17.
*FinnL.RamasamyR.DukesC.ScottJ. T. (2014). Using watchminder to increase the on-task behavior of students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5), 1408–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2300-x
18.
FredricksJ. A. (2022). The measurement of student engagement: Methodological advances and comparison of new self-report instruments. In ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 597–616). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_29
19.
*HolifieldC.GoodmanJ. C.HazelkornM.HeflinL. J. (2010). Using self-monitoring to increase attending to task and academic accuracy in children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(4), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357610380137
20.
*HuffmanJ. M.BrossL. A.WatsonE. K.WillsH. P.MasonR. A. (2019). Preliminary investigation of a self-monitoring application for a postsecondary student with autism. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3(4), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-019-00124-y
21.
HumeK.SteinbrennerJ. R.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2
22.
KeenD.AdamsD.SimpsonK. (2023). Teacher ratings of academic skills and academic enablers of children on the autism spectrum. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(10), 1085–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1881626
23.
KimS. H.BalV. H.LordC. (2018). Longitudinal follow-up of academic achievement in children with autism from age 2 to 18. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12808
24.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510743.pdf
25.
LawsonM. A.LawsonH. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
26.
LawsonM. A.MasynK. E. (2015). Analyzing profiles, predictors, and consequences of student engagement dispositions. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.11.004
27.
LedfordJ. R.ChazinK. T.LaneJ. D.ZimmermanK. N.AyresK. A. (2020). Single case analysis and review framework (Version 2). Retrieved from: http://ebip.vkcsites.org/scarfv2
28.
LeeS. H.SimpsonR. L.ShogrenK. A. (2007). Effects and implications of self-management for students with autism: A meta-analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220010101
29.
*LeggeD. B.DeBarR. M.Alber-MorganS. R. (2010). The effects of self-monitoring with a MotivAider® on the on-task behavior of fifth and sixth graders with autism and other disabilities. Journal of Behavior Assessment and Intervention in Children, 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100359
30.
LenzA. S. (2013). Calculating effect size in single-case research. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175612456401
31.
LinL. I.-K. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051
32.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2007). Learning, attention, writing, and processing speed in typical children and children with ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040601112773
33.
McDougallD. (1998). Research on self-management techniques used by students with disabilities in general education settings: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 19(5), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259801900507
34.
MoeyaertM.FerronJ. M.BeretvasS. N.Van den NoortgateW. (2014). From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.003
35.
MoeyaertM.MagginD.VerkuilenJ. (2016). Reliability, validity, and usability of data extraction programs for single-case research designs. Behavior Modification, 40(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516645763
36.
MoeyaertM.YangP.XueY. (2023). Individual participant data meta-analysis including moderators: Empirical validation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 92(4), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2023.2208062
37.
MoeyaertM.ZimmermanK. N.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Synthesis and meta-analysis of single case research. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology (pp. 393–416). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666
38.
MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.FowlerC. H.TestD. W. (2017). A college and career readiness framework for secondary students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415589926
39.
National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, Phase 2.
40.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Students with disabilities. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg
41.
ObermanL. M.KaufmannW. E. (2020). Autism spectrum disorder versus autism spectrum disorders: Terminology, concepts, and clinical practice. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00484
42.
OdomS. L.HumeK.BoydB. A.StabelA. (2012). Moving beyond the intensive behavior treatment versus eclectic dichotomy. Behavior Modification, 36(3), 270–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512444595
OuzzaniM.HammadyH. M.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. K. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
45.
PustejovskyJ. E. (2018). Using response ratios for meta-analyzing single-case designs with behavioral outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.003
46.
PustejovskyJ. E. (2019). Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures. Psychological Methods, 24(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000179
47.
RaffertyL. A.Asaro-SaddlerK. (2021). Effective self-management strategies. In SharmaU.MaheadyL. (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of inclusive and special education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1012
48.
RakapS. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single-subject experimental research: Description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12091
49.
ReichowB.BartonE. E.MagginD. M. (2018). Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008
*RomansS. K.WillsH. P.HuffmanJ. M.Garrison-KaneL. (2020). The effect of web-based self-monitoring to increase on-task behavior and academic accuracy of high school students with autism. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1732282
52.
*RosenbloomR. (2017). The effects of a technology-based self-monitoring intervention on on-task, disruptive, and task-completion behaviors for adolescents with autism (Publication No. 2013956707) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
53.
*RosenbloomR.MasonR. A.WillsH. P.MasonB. A. (2016). Technology delivered self-monitoring application to promote successful inclusion of an elementary student with autism. Assistive Technology, 28(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2015.1059384
54.
ScheelerM. C.BudinS.MarkelzA. (2016). The role of teacher preparation in promoting evidence-based practice in schools. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14(2), 171–187. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-57109-005
55.
ScheibelG.ZaeskeL. M.MaloneE. J.ZimmermanK. N. (2024). A meta-analysis of self-management interventions for students with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 110, 102294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102294
56.
SchulzeM. A. (2016). Self-management strategies to support students with ASD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(5), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916640759
57.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258700800206
58.
*SikoL. (2018). Wearable technology for self-monitoring of academic engagement in college students with autism spectrum disorder (Publication No. 10814889) [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
SparapaniN.MorganL.ReinhardtV. P.SchatschneiderC.WetherbyA. M. (2016). Evaluation of classroom active engagement in elementary students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 782–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2615-2
61.
*StasollaF.PerilliV.DamianiR. (2014). Self monitoring to promote on-task behavior by two high functioning boys with autism spectrum disorders and symptoms of ADHD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(5), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.01.007
62.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
63.
WangS.ScellsH.KoopmanB.ZucconG. (2023, July18). Can ChatGPT write a good Boolean query for systematic review literature search [Conference session]. 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Taipei, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539618.3591703
64.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.ZagerD.SmithT. E.SimpsonR. (2010). Research-based principles and practices for educating students with autism: Self-determination and social interactions. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 475–486. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879754. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471004500403
65.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
66.
*XuS.WangJ.LeeG. T.LukeN. (2017). Using self-monitoring with guided goal setting to increase academic engagement for a student with autism in an inclusive classroom in China. The Journal of Special Education, 51(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916679980
