Few studies examine the effects of behavior-specific praise (BSP) in secondary classrooms, and there is limited research examining the rate of BSP that is needed to improve classwide appropriately engaged behavior (AEB) and reduce disruptive behavior (DB). Using a multiple baseline design with an embedded A/B/C/A/C condition sequence counterbalanced across pairs of teachers, this study evaluated the effects of BSP delivered once per 2 min and once per 4 min, and the relative effects of both rates of BSP on classwide AEB and DB across four secondary classrooms. Based on visual analysis and non-overlap, using BSP once per 2 min produced large and immediate improvements in classwide AEB and DB. In contrast, using BSP once per 4 min had mixed effects on classwide AEB and DB. Overall, using BSP once per 2 min was superior to using BSP once per 4 min. Limitations, directions for future research, and practical implications are discussed.
BartholowmewD. (1993). Effective strategies for praising students. Music Educators Journal, 80(3), 40–43.
2.
BearG. G. (2013). Teacher resistance to frequent rewards and praise: Lack of skill or a wise decision?Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 23(4), 318–340.
3.
BlazeJ. T.OlmiD.MercerS. H.DufreneB. A.TingstromD. H. (2014). Loud versus quiet praise: A direct behavioral comparison in secondary classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 52(4), 349–360.
4.
BrieschA. M.HemphillE. M.VolpeR. J.DanielsB. (2015). An evaluation of observational methods for measuring response to classwide intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 37–49.
5.
BrophyJ. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5–32.
6.
CoddingR. S.LaneK. L. (2015). A spotlight on treatment intensity: An important and often overlooked component of intervention inquiry. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 1–10.
ElliottS. N.Von Brock TreutingM. (1991). The Behavior Intervention Rating Scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 43–51.
9.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020). Behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147.
10.
FlanneryK. B.FrankJ. L.KatoM. M.DorenB.FenningB. (2013). Implementing schoolwide positive behavior support in high school settings: Analysis of eight high schools. The High School Journal, 96, 267–282.
11.
FloressM. T.BeaudoinM. M.BernasR. S. (2022). Exploring secondary teachers’ actual and perceived praise and reprimand use. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24(1), 46–57.
12.
FloressM. T.BeschtaS. L.MeyerK. L.ReinkeW. M. (2017). Praise research trends and future directions: Characteristics and teacher training. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 227–243.
13.
GreenbergJ.PutmanH.WalshK. (2014). Training our future teachers: Classroom management—Revised. National Council on Teacher Quality.
14.
HaydonT.Musti-RaoS. (2011). Effective use of behavior-specific praise: A middle school case study. Beyond Behavior, 20(2), 31–39.
15.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
16.
JenkinsL. N.FloressM. T.ReinkeW. (2015). Rates and types of teacher praise: A review and future directions. Psychology in the Schools, 52(5), 463–476.
17.
KnochelA. E.BlairK. S. C.KincaidD.RandazzoA. (2022). Promoting equity in teachers’ use of behavior-specific praise with self-monitoring and performance feedback. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24(1), 17–31.
18.
KranakM. P.Alber-MorganS. R.SawyerM. R. (2017). A parametric analysis of specific praise rates on the on-task behavior of elementary students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(4), 453–464.
19.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38.
20.
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124–144.
21.
LongA. C.SanettiL. M. H.Collier-MeekM. A.GallucciJ.AltschaeflM.KratochwillT. R. (2016). An exploratory investigation of teachers’ intervention planning and perceived implementation barriers. Journal of School Psychology, 55, 1–26.
22.
MiltenbergerR. G. (2016). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (6th ed.). Thompson Wadsworth.
23.
MooreT. C.MagginD. M.ThompsonK. M.GordonJ. R.DanielsS.LangL. E. (2019). Evidence review for teacher praise to improve students’ classroom behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), 3–18.
24.
O’HandleyR. D.DufreneB. A.WhippleH. (2018). Tactile prompting and weekly performance feedback for increasing teachers’ behavior-specific praise. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(3), 324–342.
25.
O’HandleyR. D.OlmiD. J.DufreneB. A.TingstromD. H.WhippleH. (2020). The effects of behavior-specific praise and public posting in secondary classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 57(7), 1097–1115.
26.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299.
27.
PasE. T.CashA. H.O’BrennanL.DebnamK. J.BradshawC. P. (2015). Profiles of classroom behavior in high schools: Associations with teacher behavior management strategies and classroom composition. Journal of School Psychology, 53(2), 137–148.
28.
RadleyK. C.O’HandleyR. D.LaBrotZ. C. (2015). A comparison of momentary time sampling and partial-interval recording for assessment of effects of social skills training. Psychology in the Schools, 52(4), 363–378.
29.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2019). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K–12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128.
30.
ScottT. M.GageN.HirnR.HanH. (2019). Teacher and student race as a predictor for negative feedback during instruction. School Psychology, 34(1), 22–31.
31.
SheridanS. M.EagleJ. W.CowanR. J.MickelsonW. (2001). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation results of a 4-year investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 39(5), 361–385.
32.
SimonsenB.FreemanJ.GoodmanS.MitchellB.Swain-BradwayJ.FlanneryB.PutmanB. (2015). Supporting and responding to behavior: Evidence-based classroom strategies for teachers [Office of Special Education Programs Technical Assistance Brief]. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/school-discipline/support.html
33.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35(2), 245–259.
34.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT.ToddA.HornerR. (2001). School-wide evaluation tool. Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon.
35.
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(4), 403–411.
36.
WelshR. O.LittleS. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794.
37.
YoderP. J.WoynaroskiT. (2015). How to study the influence of intensity of treatment on generalized skill and knowledge acquisition in students with disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), 152–166.
