We examined the use of an intervention package consisting of the system of least prompts (SLP), visual schedules, peer models, and contingent reinforcement to teach four children with disabilities to independently play board games and communicate with their typically developing peers. We found the intervention package with individual adaptations was related to increases in independent board game play behaviors. No changes in peer-directed social communication were observed. Our study extends the research on board game play–focused interventions by demonstrating the effectiveness of the intervention package for young children with or at risk for disabilities and their typically developing peers.
ArntzenE.HalstadtrøA.HalstadtrøM. (2003). Training play behavior in a 5-year-old boy with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 367–370.
2.
AultM. J.GriffenA. K. (2013). Teaching with the system of least prompts: An easy method for monitoring progress. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(3), 46–53.
3.
BakerM. J. (2000). Incorporating the thematic ritualistic behaviors of children with autism into games. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(2), 66–84.
4.
BartonE. E. (2014). Assessing social competence and play skills. In McLeanM.HemmeterM. L.SnyderP. (Eds.), Essential elements for assessing infants and young children with special needs (pp. 195–241). Pearson.
5.
BartonE. E. (2016). Critical issues and promising practices for teaching play to young children with disabilities. In ReichowB. R.BoydB. A.BartonE. E.OdomS. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education (pp. 267–283). Springer.
6.
BartonE. E.LloydB. P.SpriggsA. D.GastD. L. (2018a). Visual analysis of graphic data. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 179–214). Routledge.
7.
BartonE. E.Meadan-KaplanskyH.LedfordJ. R. (2018b). Independent variables, fidelity, and social validity. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 133–156). Routledge.
8.
BartonE. E.PokorskiE. A.SweeneyE. M.VelezM.GossettS.QiuJ.FlahertyC.DomingoM. (2018c). An empirical examination of effective practices for teaching board game play to young children. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 138–148.
9.
Davis-TempleJ.JungS.SainatoD. M. (2014). Teaching young children with special needs and their peers to play board games: Effects of a least to most prompting procedure to increase independent performance. Behavior Analysis Practice, 7(1), 21–30.
10.
DemingJ.LovaasO. (1999). Teaching game playing skills to increase peer conversation in children with autism and related disorders. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304496665/
11.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 239–281). Routledge.
12.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.BartonE. E. (2019). Teaching in early childhood: Methods and contexts. Routledge.
13.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2018). Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 239–281). Routledge.
14.
LifterK.Foster-SandaS.ArzamarskiC.BrieschJ.McClureE. (2011). Overview of play: Its uses and importance in early intervention/early childhood special education. Infants & Young Children, 24(3), 225–245.
15.
LifterK.MasonE. J.BartonE. E. (2011). Children’s play: Where we have been and where we could go. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 281–297.
16.
MilamM. E.HemmeterM. L.BartonE. E. (2020). The effects of systematic instruction on preschoolers’ use of stay-play-talk with their peers with social delays. Journal of Early Intervention. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119900253
17.
MillsP. E.BeecherC. C.DaleP. S.ColeK. N.JenkinsJ. R. (2014). Language of children with disabilities to peers at play: Impact of ecology. Journal of Early Intervention, 36(2), 111–130.
18.
Oppenheim-LeafM. L.LeafJ. B.CallN. A. (2012). Teaching board games to two children with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(4), 347–358.
19.
QuiJ.BartonE.ChoiG. (2019). Using system of least prompts to teach play to young children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 52(4), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918796479
20.
ShepleyC.LaneJ.AultM. (2018). A review and critical examination of the system of least prompts. Remedial and Special Education, 40(5), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751213
Thiemann-BourqueK. S.BradyN. C.FlemingK. K. (2012). Symbolic play of preschoolers with severe communication impairments with autism and other developmental delays: More similarities than differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(5), 863–873.
24.
Ward-HornerJ.SturmeyP. (2010). Component analysis using single-subject experimental designs: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(4), 685–704.
25.
WoleryM.GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Comparative designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 283–334). Routledge.
