This study examined the effects of a multitiered system of support using Check-In Check-Out (CICO) as a secondary intervention and function-based self-monitoring (FBSM) as a tertiary intervention on the disruptive behavior and academic engagement of four elementary students identified as being in need of additional behavioral supports. A multiple baseline across participants’ design was conducted to evaluate the effects of CICO and a reversal design was used to evaluate the additive effects of FBSM with one participant whose behavior was determined nonresponsive to CICO due to variability and minimal change in disruptive behavior. Results indicate a reduction in disruptive behavior and increased academic engagement for three participants upon introduction of CICO. Evaluations of the FBSM intervention were rendered inconclusive; however, preliminary data revealed a decrease in trend and level of disruptive behavior for the participant receiving tertiary support.
BradshawC.MitchellM.LeafP. (2010). Examining the effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133–148.
2.
BriereD.SimonsenB. (2011). Self-monitoring interventions for at-risk middle school students: The importance of considering function. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 129–140.
3.
BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106–118. doi:10.1037/a0016159
4.
CampbellA.AndersonC. M. (2008). Enhancing effects of check-in/check-out with function-based support. Behavioral Disorders, 33, 233–245.
CroneD. A.HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
EnnisR. P.JolivetteK.SwoszowskiN. C.JohnsonM. L. (2012). Secondary prevention efforts at a residential facility for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Function-based check-in, check-out. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 29, 1–24. doi:10.1080/0886571X.2012.669250
8.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
9.
HansenB. D.WillsH. P.KampsD. M.GreenwoodC. R. (2014). Effects of function-based self-management interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22, 149–159. doi:10.1177/1063426613476345
10.
HawkenL. S.BundockK.KladisK.O’KeeffeB.BarrettC. A. (2014). Systematic review of the check-in, check-out intervention for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education & Treatment of Children, 37, 635–658.
11.
HunterK.ChenierJ.GreshamF. (2014). Evaluation of check in/check out for students with internalizing behavior problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22, 135–148. doi:10.1177/1063426613476091
12.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
14.
LoY.-y.AlgozzineB.AlgozzineK.HornerR.SugaiG. (2010). Schoolwide positive behavior support. In AlgozzineB.DaunicA. P.SmithS. W. (Eds.), Preventing problem behaviors (2nd ed., pp. 33–51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
15.
MagginD. M.ZurheideJ.PickettK. C.BaillieS. J. (2015). A systematic evidence review of the check-in/check-out program for reducing student challenging behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 197–208. doi:10.1177/1098300715573630
16.
MarchR. E.HornerR. H. (2002). Feasibility and contributions of functional behavioral assessments in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 158–170. doi:10.1177/10634266020100030401
17.
MarchR. E.HornerR. H.Lewis-PalmerL.BrownD.CroneD.ToddA. W.CarrE. (2000). Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers and Staff (FACTS). Eugene: Department of Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon.
18.
McIntoshK.CampbellA. L.CarterD. R.DickeyC. R. (2009). Differential effects of a tier two behavior intervention based on function of problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 82–93. doi:10.1177/1098300708319127
19.
MillerL. M.DufreneB. A.SterlingH. E.OlmiD. J.BachmeyerE. (2015). The effects of check-in/check-out on problem behavior and academic engagement in elementary school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 28–38. doi:10.1177/1098300713517141
20.
MooneyP.RyanJ. B.UhingB. M.ReidR.EpsteinM. H. (2005). A review of self-management learning interventions on academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203–221.
21.
Office of Special Education Programs Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2015, October). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) implementation blueprint: Part 1—Foundations and supporting information. Eugene: University of Oregon. Available from www.pbis.org
22.
O’NeillR. E.AlbinR. W.StoreyK.HornerR. H.SpragueJ. R. (2015). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (3rd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
23.
SheffieldK.WallerR. J. (2010). A review of single-case studies utilizing self-monitoring interventions to reduce problem classroom behaviors. Beyond Behavior, 19(2), 7–13.
24.
StahrB.CushingD.LaneK.FoxJ. (2006). Efficacy of a function-based intervention in decreasing off-task behavior exhibited by a student with ADHD. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 201–211. doi:10.1177/10983007060080040301
25.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT.ToddA. W.HornerR. H. (2001). School-wide evaluation tool. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon.
26.
SwoszowskiN. C.JolivetteK.FredrickL. D.HeflinL. J. (2012). Check-in/check-out: Effects on students with emotional and behavioral disorders with attention- or escape-maintained behavior in a residential facility. Exceptionality, 20, 163–178.
27.
SwoszowskiN. C.McDanielS. C.JolivetteK.MeliusP. (2013). The effects of Tier II check-in/check-out including adaptation for non-responders on the off-task behavior of elementary students in a residential setting. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 63–79. doi:10.1353/etc.2013.0024
28.
VincentC. G.Swain-BradwayJ.TobinT. J.MayS. (2011). Disciplinary referrals for culturally and linguistically diverse students with and without disabilities: Patterns resulting from school-wide positive behavior support. Exceptionality, 19, 175–190.
29.
WallerR.AlbertiniC.WallerK. (2011). Self-monitoring of performance to promote accurate work completion: A functional based intervention for a 4th grade student presenting challenging behavior. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 4, 52–60.
30.
WillsH.MasonB. (2014). Implementation of a self-monitoring application to improve on-task behavior: A high-school pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 421–434.
31.
WolfeK.PyleD.CharltonC. T.SabeyC. V.LundE. M.RossS. W. (2016). A systematic review of the empirical support for check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 74–88. doi:10.1177/1098300715595957
