Numerous well-validated academic progress monitoring tools are used in schools, but there are fewer behavioral progress monitoring measures available. Some brief behavior rating scales have been shown to be effective in monitoring students’ progress, but most focus only on students’ social skills and do not address critical academic-related behaviors. We conducted a quasi-replication of a study by Brady, Evans, Berlin, Bunford, and Kern examining the Classroom Performance Survey (CPS) by using a multi-step analytic strategy, including confirmatory factor analysis and reliability analysis. Over a period of 3 years, 160 elementary schoolteachers in 19 schools across three states completed a modified CPS on 356 elementary students identified as at-risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. The modified CPS was found to be comprised of two factors (Academic Competence and Interpersonal Competence) and showed evidence of reliability and validity. These results suggest that the CPS shows promise as a brief behavior rating scale for progress monitoring in elementary schools.
AndersonD.MunkJ.YoungK. R.ConleyL.CaldarellaP. (2008). Teaching organizational skills to promote academic achievement in behaviorally challenged students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(4), 6–13. doi:10.1177/004005990804000401
2.
BradyC. E.EvansS. W.BerlinK. S.BunfordN.KernL. (2012). Evaluating school impairment with adolescents using the Classroom Performance Survey. School Psychology Review, 41, 429–446.
3.
BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106–118. doi:10.1037/a0016159
4.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
5.
ByrneB. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CaldarellaP.MerrellK. W. (1997). Common dimensions of social skills of children and adolescents: A taxonomy of positive behaviors. School Psychology Review, 26, 264–278.
7.
ChafouleasS. M.KilgusS. P.JafferyR.Riley-TillmanT. C.WelshM.ChristT. J. (2013). Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for elementary and middle grades. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 367–385. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002
8.
ChafouleasS. M.VolpeR. J.GreshamF. M.CookC. (2010). School-based behavioral assessment within problem-solving models: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 34, 343–349.
9.
Children and Adults With Attention Deficit Disorder. (1996). ADD in adolescents: Strategies for success from CH.A.DD. Plantation, FL: Author.
10.
ClassenA.CheathamG. A. (2015). Systematic monitoring of young children’s social-emotional competence and challenging behaviors. Young Exceptional Children, 18, 29–47. doi:10.1177/1096250614523970
11.
CookC. R.VolpeR. J.DelportJ. (2014). Systematic progress monitoring of students with emotional and behavioral disorders: The promise of change-sensitive Brief Behavior Rating Scales. In WalkerH. M.GreshamF. M. (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools (pp. 211–228). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
DiPernaJ. C. (2006). Academic enablers and student achievement: Implications for assessment and intervention services in the schools. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 7–17. doi:10.1002/pits.20125
13.
DiPernaJ. C.ElliottS. N. (2000). Academic competence evaluation scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
14.
DunlapG.StrainP. S.FoxL.CartaJ. J.ConroyM.SmithB. J.. . .SowellC. (2006). Prevention and intervention with young children’s challenging behavior: Perspectives regarding current knowledge. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 29–45.
15.
EvansS. W.SchultzB. K.DeMarsC. E.DavisH. (2011). Effectiveness of the challenging horizons after-school program for young adolescents with ADHD. Behavior Therapy, 42, 462–474. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.11.008
16.
FarringtonC. A.RoderickM.AllensworthE.NagaokaJ.KeyesT. S.JohnsonD. W.BeechumN. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago, IL: Consortium on School Research, The University of Chicago.
17.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2011). Using CBM for progress monitoring in reading. Washington, DC: National Center on Student Progress Monitoring.
18.
GreshamF. M.CookC. R.CollinsT.DartE.RasetshwaneK.TruelsonE.GrantS. (2010). Developing a change-sensitive Brief Behavior Rating Scale as a progress monitoring tool for social behavior: An example using the Social Skills Rating System—Teacher Form. School Psychology Review, 39, 364–379.
19.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System: Rating Scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
20.
GreshamF. M.SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 331–344.
21.
HogeR. D.LuceS. (1979). Predicting academic achievement from classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research, 49, 479–496. doi:10.3102/00346543049003479
22.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under-parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424
24.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
25.
JenkinsL. N.DemarayM. K. (2015). An investigation of relations among academic enablers and reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 379–389. doi:10.1002/pits.21830
26.
KampsD.ConklinC.WillsH. (2015). Use of self-management with the CW-FIT group contingency program. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 1–32. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0003
27.
KampsD.WillsH.Heitzman-PowellL.LaylinJ.SzokeC.HobohmT.CuleyA. (2011). Class wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 13, 154–167. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935
28.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2005). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Second edition (Brief Form). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
29.
KentK. M.PelhamW. E.MolinaB. S.SibleyM. H.WaschbuschD. A.YuJ.. . .KarchK. M. (2011). The academic experience of male high school students with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 451–462. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9472-4
30.
KerrM. M.NelsonC. M. (2006). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
31.
LembkeE. S.StichterJ. P. (2006). Utilizing a system of screening and progress monitoring within a three-tiered model of instruction: Implications for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 15(3), 3–9.
32.
LewisT. J.ScottT. M.WehbyJ. H.WillsH. P. (2014). Direct observation of teacher and student behavior in school settings: Trends, issues and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 190–200.
33.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149
34.
MaleckiC. K.ElliotS. N. (2002). Children’s social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 1–23. doi:10.1521/scpq.17.1.1.19902
35.
McKinneyJ. D.MasonJ.PerkersonK.CliffordM. (1975). Relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 198–203. doi:10.1037/h0077012
36.
MerrellK. W. (2002). School Social Behavior Scales–Second Edition. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
37.
MerrellK. W.GueldnerB. A. (2010). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Promoting mental health and academic success. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
MeyerK.KelleyM. L. (2007). Improving homework in adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder: Self vs. parent monitoring of homework behavior and study skills. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 29(4), 25–42. doi:10.1300/J019v29n04_02
39.
MillerF. G.CohenD.ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.WelshM. E.FabianoG. A. (2015). A comparison of measures to screen for social, emotional, and behavioral risk. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 184–196. doi:10.1037/spq0000085
40.
MinskoffE.AllsoppD. (2003). Academic success strategies for adolescents with learning disabilities and ADHD. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
41.
O’ShaughnessyT. E.LaneK. L.GreshamF. M.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E. (2003). Children placed at risk for learning and behavioral difficulties: Implementing a school-wide system of early identification and intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 27–35. doi:10.1177/074193250302400103
42.
ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C.StormontM. (2013). Classroom-level positive behavior supports in schools implementing SW-PBIS: Identifying areas for enhancement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 39–50. doi:10.1177/1098300712459079
43.
RobinA. L. (1998). ADHD in adolescents. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44.
SmithS. C.LewisT. J.StormontM. (2011). The effectiveness of two universal behavioral supports for children with externalizing behavior in Head Start classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 133–143. doi:10.1177/1098300710379053
45.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
46.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237. doi:10.1080/09362830903235375
47.
TappJ. T.WehbyJ. H.EllisD. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 25–31. doi:10.3758/bf03203616
48.
Trevino-MaackS. I.KampsD.WillsH. (2015). A group contingency plus self-management intervention targeting at-risk secondary students’ class-work and active engagement. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 347–360. doi:10.1177/0741932514561865
49.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
50.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (2nd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
51.
WangJ.WangX. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
52.
WehbyJ. H.KernL. (2014). Intensive behavior intervention: What is it, what is its evidence base, and why do we need to implement now?Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 38–44. doi:10.1177/0040059914523956
53.
WentzelK. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.357
54.
WillsH. P.IwaszukW. M.KampsD.ShumateE. (2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency effects across the day. Education and Treatment of Children, 37, 191–210. doi:10.1353/etc.2014.0016
55.
WillsH. P.KampsD.HansenB.ConklinC.BellingerS.NeaderhiserJ.NsubugaB. (2010). The classwide function-based intervention team program. Preventing School Failure, 54, 164–171. doi:10.1080/10459880903496230
56.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.
