This study examined the viability of a brief, parent-reported strengths and needs assessment as the first step in a multiple-gating approach to proactive positive behavior support for families. The Positive Family Support–Strengths and Needs Assessment (PFS-SaNA) was designed to collaboratively engage parents early in the school year in a home–school coordinated Positive Family Support (PFS) system. In this study, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the PFS-SaNA in the context of public middle schools. Findings suggest that the 14-item, unidimensional PFS-SaNA shows convergent validity with teacher ratings of risk. It can be easily and cost-effectively used by school personnel when parents register their children for school at the beginning of each school year.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.371
2.
BlaséK. A.FixsenD. L.DudaM. A.MetzA. J.NaoomS. F.Van DykeM. K. (2008, April). Real scale up: Improving access to evidence-based programs. Presentation at the Blueprints Conference, Denver, CO.
3.
CattellR. (1966). The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
4.
ChristensonS. L. (2004). The family–school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Review, 33, 83–104.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
6.
ConnellA. M.DishionT. J. (2008). Reducing depression among at-risk early adolescents: Three-year effects of a family-centered intervention embedded within schools. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 574–585. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.574
7.
CronbachL. J.GleserG. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
8.
DishionT. J. (2000). Cross-setting consistency in early adolescent psychopathology: Deviant friendships and problem behavior sequelae. Journal of Personality, 68, 1109–1126. doi:10.111/1467-6494.00128
9.
DishionT. J. (2011). Promoting academic competence and behavioral health in public schools: A strategy of systemic concatenation of empirically based intervention principles [Special issue]. School Psychology Review, 40, 590–597.
10.
DishionT. J.KavanaghK. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
DishionT. J.KavanaghK.SchneigerA.NelsonS.KaufmanN. K. (2002). Preventing early adolescent substance use: A family-centered strategy for the public middle school. Prevention Science, 3, 191–201. doi:10.1023/A:1019994500301
12.
DishionT. J.PattersonG. R. (1993). Antisocial behavior: Using a multiple gating strategy. In SingerM. I.SingerL. T.AnglinT. M. (Eds.), Handbook for screening adolescents at psychosocial risk (pp. 375–399). New York, NY: Lexington Books.
13.
DishionT. J.StormshakE. (2007). Intervening in children’s lives: An ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
DowdyE. K.RitcheyK.KamphausR. W. (2010). School-based screening: A population-based approach to inform and monitor children’s mental health needs. School Mental Health, 2, 166–176. doi:10.1007/s12310-010-9036-3
15.
EcclesJ. S.HaroldR. D. (1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescent’s schooling. In BoothA.DunnJ. F. (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
FoscoG. M.FrankJ. L.StormshakE. A.DishionT. J. (2013). Opening the “black box”: Family Check-Up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 455–468. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.001
17.
FoscoG. M.SeeleyJ. R.DishionT. J.SmolkowskiK.StormshakE. A.Downey-McCarthyR.. . . StryckerL. A. (2014). Lessons learned from scaling up the ecological approach to family interventions and treatment in middle schools. In WeistM.LeverN.BradshawC.OwensJ. (Eds.), Handbook of school mental health: Research, training, practice, and policy (2nd ed., pp. 237–251). New York, NY: Springer.
18.
FoxL.DunlapG.CushingL. (2002). Early intervention, positive behavior support, and transition to school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 149–157. doi:10.1177/10634266020100030301
19.
HendersonA. T.MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on students’ achievement. Austin, TX: National Center of Family and Community Connections With Schools, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
20.
HoagwoodK.BurnsB. J.KiserL.RingeisenH.SchoenwaldS. K. (2001). Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1179–1189. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1179
21.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.SmolkowskiK.EberL.NakasatoJ.ToddA. W.EsperanzaJ. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144. doi:10/1177/1098300709332067
22.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2007). Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. Oxford, UK: Pearson Assessment.
24.
KavanaghK.BurrastonB.DishionT. J.SchneigerA. (2000, March). Identification of middle school students’ risk behavior: Contextual influences of gender and ethnicity. Poster session presented at the eighth biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Chicago, IL.
25.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.KalbergJ. R. (2012). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.CarterE. W.MessengerM. (2015). Examining behavioral risk and academic performance for students transitioning from elementary to middle school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 39–49. doi:10.1177/1098300714524825
27.
McDermottP. A. (1993). National standardization of uniform multisituational measures of child and adolescent psychology. Psychological Assessment, 5, 413–424. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.4.413
28.
MillerG. E.BrodyG. H.YuT.ChenE. (2014). Mitigating the effects of childhood disadvantage: Family-oriented intervention reduces inflammation in low-SES African American youth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 11287–11292. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406578111
29.
MuthénB. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132. doi:10.1007/BF02294210
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
31.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2). Oxford, UK: Pearson.
32.
ShawM. C. (1986). The prevention of learning and interpersonal problems. Journal of Counseling & Development, 64, 624–627. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1986.tb01024.x
33.
SheridanS. M.KnocheL. L.KupzykK. A.Pope EdwardsC.MarvinC. A. (2011). A randomized trial examining the effects of parent engagement on early language and literacy: The Getting Ready intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 361–383. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.001
34.
SobermanL. H. (1994). Psychometric validation of a brief teacher screening instrument. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order No. 9519688)
35.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. C. (1980, May). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
36.
StoepA. V.McCauleyE.ThompsonK. A.HertingJ. R.KuoE. S.StewartD. G.. . . KushnerS. (2005). Universal emotional health screening at the middle school transition. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 213–223. doi:10.1177/10634266050130040301
37.
StormshakE. A.ConnellA. M.DishionT. J. (2009). An adaptive approach to family-centered intervention in schools: Linking intervention engagement to academic outcomes in middle and high school. Prevention Science, 10, 221–235. doi:10.1007/s11121-009-0131-3
38.
StormshakE. A.ConnellA. M.VéronneauM.-H.MyersM. W.DishionT. J.KavanaghK.CaruthersA. (2011). An ecological approach to promoting early adolescent mental health and social adaptation: Family-centered intervention in public middle schools. Child Development, 82, 209–225. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01551.x
39.
ToddA. W.CampbellA. L.MeyerG. G.HornerR. (2008). The effects of a targeted intervention to reduce problem behaviors: Elementary school implementation of check in–check out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 46–55.
40.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
41.
Van RyzinM. J.DishionT. J. (2012). The impact of a family-centered intervention on the ecology of adolescent antisocial behavior: Modeling developmental sequelae and trajectories during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 1139–1155.
42.
Van RyzinM. J.StormshakE. A.DishionT. J. (2012). Engaging parents in the Family Check-Up in middle school: Longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the transition to high school. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 627–633. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255
43.
VerhulstF. C.KootH. M.Van der EndeJ. (1994). Differential predictive value of parents’ and teachers’ reports of children’s problem behaviors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 531–546.
44.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
