Students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often exhibit rigidity, which can lead to difficulties with transitions. Such difficulties can explain why students with ASD are placed in more restrictive educational environments. This review offers a quantitative synthesis of effects of interventions aimed to improve transitions of students with ASD and provides a descriptive overview of the quality of the included studies. Analyses focused on the main component of the intervention, topography of challenging behavior, and the type of transition expected of students with ASD. Activity schedules were most prominently used and most successful to ease transition difficulties. Strategies that align with preferences of students with ASD also successfully improved transitions. Practical implications and suggestions for future research are provided.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
*AngellM. E.NicholsonJ. K.WattsE. H.BlumC. (2011). Using a multicomponent adapted power card strategy to decrease latency during interactivity transitions for three children with developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 206–217.
3.
*BandaD. R.KubinaR. M.Jr. (2006). The effects of a high-probability request sequencing technique in enhancing transition behaviors. Education & Treatment of Children, 29, 507–516.
4.
Biosoft. (2004). UnGraph for Windows (Version 5.0). Cambridge, UK: Author.
5.
*BlairK. C.FoxL.LentiniR. (2010). Use of positive behavior support to address the challenging behavior of young children within a community early childhood program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30, 68–79.
6.
*BryanL. C.GastD. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553–567.
7.
BuckleyS. D.NewchokD. K. (2005). Differential impact of response effort within a response chain on the use of mands in a student with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 77–85.
8.
BuschbacherP. W.FoxL. (2003). Understanding and intervening with the challenging behavior of young children with autism spectrum disorder. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 217–227.
9.
CampbellJ. M. (2013). Commentary on PND at 25. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 20–25.
10.
CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC. R.RobinsonS. L. (1987). Application of an ecobehavioral approach to the evaluation of early intervention programs. In PrinzR. (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (Vol. 3, pp. 123–155) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
11.
*CihakD. F. (2011). Comparing pictorial and video modeling activity schedules during transitions for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 433–441.
12.
*CihakD. F.FahrenkrogC.AyresK. M.SmithC. (2010). The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts to improve transitional behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders in the general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 103–115.
13.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
14.
*DettmerS.SimpsonR. L.MylesB. S.GanzJ. B. (2000). The use of visual supports to facilitate transitions of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 163–169.
15.
*DooleyP.WilczenskiF. L.ToremC. (2001). Using an activity schedule to smooth school transitions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 57–61.
16.
FlanneryK. B.HornerR. H. (1994). The relationship between predictability and problem behavior for students with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 157–176.
17.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
18.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.StrainP. S.ToddA. W.ReedH. K. (2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 423–446.
19.
JangJ.DixonD. R.TarboxJ.GranpeeshehD. (2011). Symptom severity and challenging behavior in children with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1028–1032.
20.
KalbergJ. R.LaneK. L.MenziesH. M. (2010). Using systematic screening procedures to identify students who are nonresponsive to primary prevention efforts: Integrating academic and behavioral measures. Education & Treatment of Children, 33, 561–584.
*KuttlerS.MylesB. S.CarlsonJ. K. (1998). The use of social stories to reduce precursors to tantrum behavior in a student with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 176–182.
23.
LequiaJ.MachalicekW.RispoliM. (2012). Effects of activity schedules on challenging behavior exhibited in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 480–492.
24.
MachalicekW.O’ReillyM.BeretvasN.SigafoosJ.LancioniG. (2007). A review of interventions to reduce challenging behavior in school settings for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 229–246.
25.
*MancilG. R.HaydonT.WhitbyP. (2009). Differentiated effects of paper and computer-assisted social stories™ on inappropriate behavior in children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 205–215.
26.
*MasseyN. G.WheelerJ. J. (2000). Acquisition and generalization of activity schedules and their effects on task engagement in a young child with autism in an inclusive pre-school classroom. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 326–335.
27.
MatsonJ. L.GonzalesM. L.RivetT. T. (2008). Reliability of the autism spectrum disorder-behavior problems for children (ASD-BPC). Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 696–706.
28.
MatsonJ. L.WilkinsJ.MackenJ. (2009). The relationship of challenging behaviors to severity and symptoms of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2, 29–44.
29.
McCordB. E.ThomsonR. J.IwataB. A. (2001). Functional analysis and treatment of self-injury associated with transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 195–210.
30.
McTiernanA.LeaderG.HealyO.MannionA. (2011). Analysis of risk factors and early predictors of challenging behavior for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1215–1222.
31.
MurphyG. H.Beadle-BrownJ.WingL.GouldJ.ShahA.HolmesN. (2005). Chronicity of challenging behaviors in people with severe intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A total population sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 405–418.
32.
ParkerR. I.Hagan-BurkeS. (2007). Useful effect size interpretations for single case research. Behavior Therapy, 38, 95–105.
33.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367.
34.
ParkerR. I.VannestK.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322.
35.
RegisterD.HumpalM. (2007). Using musical transitions in early childhood classrooms: Three case examples. Music Therapy Perspectives, 25, 25–31.
36.
RojahnJ.MatsonJ. L.LottD.EsbensenA. J.SmallsY. (2001). The Behavior Problems Inventory: An instrument for the assessment of self-injury, stereotyped behavior and aggression/destruction in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 577–588.
37.
*SainatoD. M.StrainP. S.LefebvreD.RappN. (1987). Facilitating transition times with handicapped preschool children: A comparison between peer-mediated and antecedent prompt procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 285–291.
38.
*SchmitJ.AlperS.RaschkeD.RyndakD. (2000). Effects of using a photographic cueing package during routine school transitions with a child who has autism. Mental Retardation, 38, 131–137.
39.
ShadishW. R.BrasilI. C.IllingworthD. A.WhiteK. D.GalindoR.NaglerE. D.RindskopfD. M. (2009). Using UnGraph to extract data from image files: Verification of reliability and validity. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 177–183.
40.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2011). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
41.
Sterling-TurnerH. E.JordanS. S. (2007). Interventions addressing transition difficulties for individuals with autism. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 681–691.
42.
StrainP. S.WilsonK.DunlapG. (2011). Prevent-teach-reinforce: Addressing problem behaviors of students with autism in general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 160–171.
43.
U.S. Department of Education. (2011). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19
44.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO. (2011). Single Case Research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 1.0) [Web-based application]. College Station: Texas A&M University. Available from singlecaseresearch.org
45.
VolkmarF. R.WiesnerL. A. (2009). A practical guide to autism: What every parent, family member, and teacher needs to know. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
46.
*WatersM. B.LermanD. C.HovanetzA. N. (2009). Separate and combined effects of visual schedules and extinction plus differential reinforcement on problem behavior occasioned by transitions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 309–313.
