The importance of collecting and using data for educational decision making is clear. However, little information has been gathered about the systematic collection and use of data in early childhood. The purpose of this study was to explore teacher perceptions of data collection practices in early childhood. Participants included 137 early childhood professionals from five programs. Participants completed an online survey on current methods for data collection, analysis, and use, as well as if systems were in place, to support specific types of activities. The early childhood professionals who participated in the survey indicated that the vast majority of the items related to data collection practices were important; interestingly, overall importance ratings were higher than overall frequency items for all practices. The findings, limitations, and contributions to the literature are discussed.
ArdoinS. P.WittJ. C.ConnellJ. E.KoenigJ. L. (2005). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional, planning, decision-making, and the identification of children in need of services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 362–380.
2.
BrowderD.DemchakM.HellerM.KingD. (1989). An in vivo evaluation of the use of data-based rules to guide instructional decisions. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14, 234–240.
3.
BrowderD.LibertyK.HellerM.D’HuyvettersK. (1986). Self-management by teachers: Improving instructional decision-making. Professional School Psychology, 1, 165-167.
4.
BuyseeV.Peisner-FeinbergE. (2011). Recognition and response overview. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from http://randr.fpg.unc.edu
5.
CarterD. R.Van NormanR. K.TredwellC. (2011). Program-wide positive behavior support in preschool: Lessons for getting started. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 349–355.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CookC.HeathF.ThompsonR. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
8.
CookeN. L.HewardW. L.TestD. W.SpoonerF.CoursonF. H. (1991). Student performance data in the classroom: Measurement and evaluation of student progress. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 155–161.
9.
CoppleC.BredekampS. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
10.
DillmanD. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
11.
FeldmanJ.TungR. (2001). Using data-based inquiry and decision making to improve instruction. ERS Spectrum, 19(3), 10–19.
12.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 54, 199–208.
13.
GischlarK. L.HojnoskiR. L.MissallK. N. (2009). Improving child outcomes with data-based decision making: Interpreting and using data. Young Exceptional Children, 13(1), 2–18.
14.
GunterP. L.CallicottK.DennyR. K.GerberB. L. (2003). Finding a place for data collection in classrooms for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure, 48(1), 4–8.
15.
HaringN.LibertyK.WhiteO. (1981). Final report: Field initiated research studies of phases of learning and facilitating instructional events for the severely/profoundly handicapped (U.S. Department of Education Contract No. G007500593). Seattle: University of Washington, College of Education.
16.
Head Start Bureau. (2001). Head start child outcomes framework. Head Start Bulletin, 70, 44–50.
17.
HewardW. L. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
18.
HojnoskiR. L.CaskieG. I. L.GischlarK. L.KeyJ. M.BarryA.HughesC. L. (2009). Data display preference, acceptability, and accuracy among urban head start teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 38–53.
19.
HojnoskiR. L.GischlarK. L.MissallK. N. (2009). Improving child outcomes with data-based decision making: Graphing data. Young Exceptional Children, 12(4), 15–30.
20.
IngramD.Seashore LouisK.SchroederR. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. 106, 1258–1287.
21.
KerrK. A.MarshJ. A.IkemotoG. S.DarilekH.BarneyH. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112, 496–520.
22.
KramerM.SchmalenbergC.BrewerB.VerranJ.Keller-UngerJ. (2009). Accurate assessment of clinical nurses’ work environments: Response rate needed. Research in Nursing & Health, 32, 229–240.
23.
KraschD.CarterD. (2009). Monitoring classroom behavior in early childhood: Using group observation data to make decisions. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 475–482.
24.
LewisT. J.SugaiG. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(6), 1–24.
National Title I Association & the National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2011). Recommendations for improved coordination between Title I and IDEA. Retrieved from http://www.nasdse.org/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx
27.
OdomS. L.ShusterS. K. (1986). Naturalistic inquiry and the assessment of young handicapped children and their families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6(2), 68–82.
28.
OlswangL.BainB. (1994). Data collection: Monitoring children’s treatment progress. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 55–66.
29.
Plauché JohnsonC.MyersS. M. & The Council on Children With Disabilities. (2007). Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 120, 1183–1215.
30.
SandallS. R.SchwartzI. S.LacroixB. (2004). Interventionists’ perspectives about data collection in integrated early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 161–174.
31.
SchwartzI. S.OlswangL. G. (1996). Evaluating child behavior change in natural settings: Exploring alternative strategies for data collection. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 82–101.
32.
StormontM.LewisT. J.BecknerR. (2005). Positive behavior support systems: Applying key features in preschool settings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(6), 42–49.
33.
StormontM.LewisT. J.BecknerR.JohnsonN. W. (2008). Implementing positive behavior support systems in early childhood and elementary settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34.
StormontM.LewisT. J.SmithS. C. (2005). Behavior support strategies in early childhood: Teachers’ importance and feasibility ratings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 131–139.
35.
StrachotaE.SchmidtS. W.ConceicaoS. C. O. (2006, October). The development and validation of a survey instrument for the evaluation of instructional aids. Paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education, St. Louis, MO.
36.
StrandP.CernaS. (2010). The effects of a data dissemination strategy on the letter naming and object counting skills of preschoolers attending head start. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 289–305.
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2011). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
WaymanJ. C.StringfieldS. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112, 549–571.
41.
WhiteO. R. (1986). Precision teaching-precision learning. Exceptional Children, 52, 522–534.
