School-wide positive behavior support (SWPBS) focuses on promoting social competence through the establishment of behavior expectations that are explicitly taught and reinforced by all teachers across all settings. This study investigated the validity of using adherence to SWPBS behavior expectations as a screening tool for predicting behavior risk status. A total of 961 students at a middle school serving Grades 6 through 8 were screened using the school’s SWPBS expectations and a standardized norm-referenced emotional and behavioral screener. Results revealed strong associations between the extent of students’ adherence to SWPBS expectations and the adaptive, externalizing, and school problem constructs derived from the norm-referenced screener items; associations with the norm-referenced screener’s internalizing construct were weaker. Classification analyses yielded mixed results despite the comparability between the results of the SWPBS expectations procedure and the standardized norm-referenced screener.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
2.
BohanonH.FenningP.CarneyK. L.MinnisM.Anderson-HarrisS.MorozK.PigottT. D. (2006). School-wide application of urban high school positive behavior support: A case study. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 131–145.
3.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
4.
BurkeM. D.DavisJ. D.LeeY.Hagan-BurkeS.KwokO.SugaiG. (2012). Universal screening for behavioral risk in elementary schools using SWPBS expectations. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 38–54.
5.
BurkeM. D.VannestK. (2008). Behavioral progress monitoring using the e-DBRC System. Preventing School Failure, 52, 51–60.
6.
BurkeM. D.VannestK.DavisJ.DavisC.ParkerR. (2009). Reliability of frequent retrospective behavior ratings for elementary school students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 212–222.
7.
ChafouleasS. M.KilgusS. P.WallachN. (2010). Ethical dilemmas in school-based behavioral screening. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 245–252.
8.
CookR. C.VolpeR. J.LivanisA. (2010). Constructing a roadmap for future universal screening research beyond academics. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 197–205.
9.
Education Service Center Region XIII. (2010). Referral Assessment Management Portal. Retrieved from http://www4.esc13.net/ramp
10.
ElliottS. N.HuaiN.RoachA. T. (2007). Universal and early screening for educational difficulties: Current and future applications. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 137–161.
11.
GreshamF. M. (2000). Assessment of social skills in students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26, 51–58.
12.
Hagan-BurkeS.BurkeM. D.SugaiG. (2007). Using structural analysis and academic-based intervention for a student at-risk for E/BD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 174–190.
13.
HawkenL. S.MacLeodK. S.RawlingsL. (2007). Effects of the behavior education program (BEP) on office discipline referrals of elementary school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 94–101.
14.
HawkenL. S.VincentC. G.SchumannJ. (2008). Response to intervention for social behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 213–225.
15.
HornerR. B. (2004). The School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12.
16.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
KlineR. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
LaneK.ParksR. J. L.KalbergJ. R.CarterE. W. (2007). Systematic screening at the middle school level: Score reliability and validity of the student risk screening scale. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 209–222.
20.
LynassL.TsaiS.RichmanT. D.CheneyD. (2012). Social expectations and behavioral indicators in school-wide positive behavior supports: A national study of behavior matrices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 153–161.
21.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
22.
McIntoshK.CampbellA. L.CarterD. R.ZumboB. D. (2009). Concurrent validity of office discipline referrals and cut points used in school-wide positive behavior support. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 100–113.
23.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
24.
MessickS. (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45, 35–44.
25.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
26.
PepeM. S. (2003). The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ.BoltS. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
SeversonH. H.WalkerH. M.Hope-DoolittleJ.KratochwillT. T.GreshamF. M. (2007). Proactive, early screening to detect behaviorally at-risk students: Issues, approaches, emerging innovations, and professional practices. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 193–223.
29.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 173–180.
30.
SugaiG.Hagan-BurkeS.Lewis-PalmerT. (2004). School-wide discipline and instructional classroom management: A systems approach (2nd ed.). In DarchC.Kame’enuiE. (Eds.), Instructional classroom management: A proactive approach to behavior management (pp. 218–248). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
31.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
32.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237.
33.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT.Hagan-BurkeS. (1999–2000). Overview of the functional behavioral assessment process. Exceptionality, 8, 149–160.
34.
SugaiG.SpragueJ. R.HornerR. H.WalkerH. M. (2000). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94–101.
35.
SwetsJ.DawesR.MonahanJ. (2000). Better decisions through science. Scientific American, 283, 82–87.
36.
Taylor-GreeneS. D.NelsonL.LongtonJ.GassmanT.CohenJ.SwartzJ.HallS. (1997). School-wide behavioral support: Starting the year off right. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 99–112.
37.
ToddA. W.HornerR. H.NewtonJ. S.AlgozzineR. F.AlgozzineK. M.FrankJ. L. (2011). Effects of team-initiated problem solving on decision making by schoolwide behavior support teams. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 42–59.
38.
VannestK.DavisJ. L.DavisC. R.MasonB. A.BurkeM. D. (2010). Effective intervention for behavior with a daily behavior report card: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 39, 654–672.
39.
VolpeR. J.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2010). Linking screening for emotional and behavioral problems to problem-solving efforts: An adaptive model of behavioral assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 240–244.
40.
WalkerB.CheneyD.StageS.BlumC. (2005). Schoolwide screening and positive behavior support: Identifying and supporting students at risk of school failure. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 194–204.
41.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
42.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. (1990). Systematic screening of behavior disorders (SSBD): A multiple gating procedure. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
45.
ZhouX.ObuchowskiN. A.McClishD. K. (2002). Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley.
