The effectiveness of a daily report card in an intervention package involving home-school communication to decrease disruptive behavior in preschoolers was investigated. A sample of four preschool-aged children in two classrooms served as participants. Teachers rated behavior three times daily for each participant using a daily report card. Ratings were shared with the student and then parent, and contingent reinforcement involving positive praise and stickers was provided. A concurrent multiple baseline across-participants design was employed, with results demonstrating decreases in disruptive behavior for all students. Overall, results indicated the daily report card intervention with a home-school component to be an effective method for decreasing problem behavior in a preschool setting.
AlkonA.RamlerM.MacLennanK. (2003). Evaluation of mental health consultation in child care centers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31, 91–99.
2.
ChafouleasS. M. (2011). Direct behavior rating: A review of the issues and research in its development. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 575–591.
3.
ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.McCoachD. B. (2009). Moving beyond assessment of treatment acceptability: An examination of the factor structure of the Usage Rating Profile–Intervention (URP-I). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 36–47.
4.
ChafouleasS. M.Riley-TillmanT. C.McDougalJ. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157–169.
5.
ChafouleasS. M.SanettiL. M. H.JafferyR.FallonL. (in press). Research to practice: An evaluation of a class-wide intervention package involving self-management and group contingency on behavior of middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education.
6.
CoxD. D. (2005). Evidence-based interventions using home–school collaboration. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 473–497.
7.
FabianoG. A.VujnovicR.PelhamW. E.WaschbuschD. A.MassettiG. M.YuJ. . . . VolkerM. (2010). Enhancing the effectiveness of special education programming for children with ADHD using a daily report card. School Psychology Review, 39, 219–239.
8.
FoxL.DunlapG.CushingL. (2002). Early intervention, positive behavior support, and transition to school. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 10, 149–158.
9.
FoxL.DunlapG.HemmeterM. L.JosephG. E.StrainP. S. (2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58, 48–52.
10.
GilliamW. S.ShabarG. S. (2006). Preschool and childcare expulsion and suspension: Rates and predictors in one state. Infants and Young Children, 19, 228–245.
11.
HemmeterM. L.OstroskyM.FoxL. (2006). Social and emotional foundations for early learning: A conceptual model for intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 583–601.
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
13.
JurbergsN.PalcicJ.KelleyM. L. (2007). School-home notes with and without response cost: Increasing attention and academic performance in low-income children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 358–379.
14.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
KelleyM. L. (1990). School-home notes: Promoting children’s classroom success. New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
KelleyM. L.McCainA. P. (1995). Promoting academic performance in inattentive children: The relative efficacy of school-home notes with or without response cost. Behavior Modification, 19, 357–375.
17.
KnitzerJ. (2002). Promoting social and emotional readiness for school: Toward a policy agenda. Kauffman Early Education Exchange, 1, 100–119.
18.
McCainA. P.KelleyM. L. (1993). Managing the classroom behavior of an ADHD preschooler: The efficacy of a school-home note intervention. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 15, 33–44.
19.
National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices. (2007). Review of incredible years. Retrieved from http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/
20.
PiantaR. (2007). Preschool is school, sometimes: Making early childhood education matter. Education Next, 1,44–49.
21.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children: Behavior rating scales (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
22.
Riley-TillmanT. C.ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M. (2007). A school practitioner’s guide to using daily behavior report cards to monitor interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), 77–89.
23.
ShonkoffJ.PhillipsD. A (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
24.
SmithM. A.WilliamsR. L.McLaughlinT. F. (1983). The daily report card as an intervention technique for classroom academic and social behavior: A review. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 7, 369–380.
25.
StormontM.Covington SmithS.LewisT. J. (2007). Teacher implementation of precorrection and praise statements in Head Start classrooms as a component of a program-wide system of PBS. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 280–290.
26.
WalkerH. M.KavanaghK.StillerB.GollyA.SeversonH. H.FeilE. G. (1997). First step to success: An early intervention program for antisocial kindergartners. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
27.
WatkinsM. W.PachecoM. (2000). Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 205–212.
28.
Webster-StrattonC. (1990). Stress: A potential disruptor of parent perceptions and family interactions. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 4, 302–312.
29.
Webster-StrattonC. (2001). The incredible years: Parents, teachers and children training series. Leader’s guide. Seattle, WA: Author.
