The three-tiered School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) model is now being implemented in more than 13,000 schools in the United States (Horner, Sugai, & Anderson, 2010). One core feature of Tier One of the SWPBIS model is the identification of social expectations and behavior indicators across all school settings. This study examined the types and frequency of schools’ social expectations and behavioral indicators as they were written into their behavior matrices. Participants from 155 schools located in 12 regionally representative states provided a sample of their behavioral matrix. Analyses of the matrices showed that three social expectations (respect, responsibility, and safety) occurred in more than 60% of behavior matrices. In addition, behavior indicators (e.g., walk to the right, quiet voices, hands to self) were identified for the four most frequent social expectations. Regional and state comparisons of social expectation frequency indicate homogeneity of categories across the country. Based on the findings, implications and suggestions for future research and practice are discussed.
BarnoskiR. P. (2001). Foundations for learning: Safe and civil schools analysis documentation. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
2.
BushawW. J.McNeeJ. A. (2009). The 41st Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools Americans speak out: Are educators and policy makers listening?Phi Delta Kappa, 91, 8–23.
3.
CarrE.DunlapG.HornerR. H.KoegelR. L.TurnballA. P.SailorW.. . . FoxL. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 4–16.
4.
CartledgeG.KoureaL. (2008). Culturally responsive classrooms for culturally diverse students with and at risk for disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 351–371.
5.
CheneyD.FlowerA.TempletonT. (2008). Applying response to intervention metrics in the social domain for students at risk of developing emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 42, 108–126.
6.
CroneD. A.HornerR. H.HawkenL. S. (2004). Responding to problem behaviors: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford.
7.
ElamS. M.RoseL. C. (1990). The 22nd annual Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 72, 41–55.
8.
ElamS. M.RoseL. C. (1995). The 27th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 77, 41–56.
9.
GallupG. (1970). The 2nd annual survey of the public’s attitude toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 52, 97–112.
10.
GallupA. (1975). The 7th annual Gallup Poll of public attitudes toward education. Phi Delta Kappa, 57, 227–241.
11.
GallupA. (1985). The 17th annual Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 67, 35–47.
12.
GeorgeH. P.KincaidD.Pollard-SageJ. (2008). Primary-tier interventions and supports. In SailorW.DunlapG.SugaiG.HornerR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 357–394). New York: Springer.
13.
HornerR. H.SugaiG. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining schoolwide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
14.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.AndersonC. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8), 1–16.
15.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.SmolkowskiK.EberL.NakasatoJ.ToddA.EsperanzaJ. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144.
16.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In BambaraL.KernL. (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford.
17.
HornerR. H.ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT.IrvinL. K.SugaiG.BolandJ. B. (2004). The school-wide evaluation tool (SET): A research instrument of assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12.
18.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.ToddA. W.Lewis-PalmerT. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In BambaraL.KernL. (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford.
19.
KaneM. T. (2006). Validation. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
KnoffH. M. (2007). Best practices in implementing statewide positive behavioral support systems. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-V. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
21.
LewisJ. L.PowersL. J.KelkM. J.NewcomerL. L. (2002). Reducing problem behaviors on the playground: An investigation of the application of school-wide positive behavior supports. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 181–190.
22.
LewisT. J.SugaiG. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(6), 1–24.
23.
LohrmannS.FormanS.MartinS.PalmieriM. (2008). Understanding school personnel’s resistance to adopting Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support at a universal level of intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 256–269.
24.
LuiselliJ. K.PutnamR. F.SunderlandM. (2002). Longitudinal evaluation of behavior support intervention in a public middle school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 182–188.
25.
LynassL.CheneyD.MielenzC.McGuireC.IwaszukW. (2010). An analysis of the reliability of teacher ratings on the daily progress report card in a tier two behavior intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
MuscottH. S.MannE.LeBrunM. (2008). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in New Hampshire: Effects of large-scale implementation of schoolwide positive behavior support on student discipline and academic achievement. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 10, 190–205.
28.
NelsonJ R.MartellaR. M.Marchand-MartellaN. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 136–148.
29.
NetzelD. M.EberL. (2003). Shifting from reactive to proactive discipline in an urban school district: A change of focus through PBIS implementation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(2), 71–79.
30.
NeuendorfK. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
NeumanW. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
RoseL.GallupA. (2000). The 32nd annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 82, 41–48, 53–58.
33.
SheltonA.OwensE.SongH. (2009). An examination of public school safety measures across geographic settings. Journal of School Health, 79, 24–29.
34.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidenced-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380.
35.
SprickR. (2009). Doing discipline differently. Principal Leadership, 9(5), 19–22.
36.
SugaiG.HornerR. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.
37.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.AlgozzineR.BarrettS.LewisT.AndersonC.. . . SimonsenB. (2010). School-wide positive behavior support: Implementers’ blueprint and self-assessment. Eugene: University of Oregon.
38.
Taylor-GreeneS. J.KartubD. T. (2000). Durable implementation of school-wide behavior support: The High Five Program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 233–235.
39.
ToddA.CampbellA.MeyerG.HornerR. H. (2008). Evaluation of a targeted group intervention in elementary students: The Check-in/Check-out Program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10, 46–55.
