Behavior support in schools is increasingly viewed as a three-tier prevention effort in which universal interventions are used for primary prevention, targeted interventions are used for secondary prevention, and intensive interventions are used for tertiary prevention. A growing body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of targeted interventions in decreasing the frequency of problem behaviors. The Check In—Check Out Program (CICO) is becoming a recognized targeted intervention. The present study examines if there is a functional relation between the implementation of CICO and a reduction in problem behaviors. Results indicate that implementation of CICO with four elementary school—age boys was functionally related to a reduction in problem behavior. Clinical and conceptual implications of these results, methodological limitations, and future research directions are reviewed.
Albin, R.W., Lucyshyn, J.M., Horner, R.H., & Flannery, K.B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans: A model for a goodness of fit. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 81—98). Baltimore: Brookes .
2.
Blechman, E.A., Taylor, C.J., & Schrader, S.M. (1981). Family problem solving versus home notes as early investigation with high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 919—926.
3.
Burkwist, B.J., Mabee, W.S., & McLaughlin, T.F. (1987). The effect of a daily report card system on inappropriate classroom verbalizations with a junior high school learning-disabled student. Techniques, 3, 265—272.
4.
Chafouleas, S.M., McDougal, J.L., Riley-Tillman, C.T., Panahon, C.J., & Hilt, A.M. (2005). What do daily behavior report cards (DBRC's) measure? An initial comparison of DBRC's with direct observation for off-task behavior . Psychology in the Schools, 42, 669—676.
5.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, C.T., & McDougal, J.L. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157—169.
6.
Condon, K.A., & Tobin, T.J. (2001). Using electronic and other new ways to help students improve their behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(1), 44—51.
7.
Crone, D.A., Horner, R.H., & Hawken, L. (2003). Responding to problem behavior in the school: The behavior education program. New York: Guilford.
8.
Davies, D.E., & McLaughlin, T.F. (1989). Effects of a daily report card on disruptive behavior in primary students. BCJournal of Special Education, 13, 173—181.
9.
Dougherty, E.H., & Dougherty, A. (1977). The daily report card: A simplified and flexible package for classroom behavior management. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 191—195.
10.
Fairbanks, S., Sugai, S., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (in press). Response to intervention: An evaluation of a classroom system of behavior support for second grade students. Exceptional Children.
11.
Fairchild, T.N. (1983). Effects of a daily report card system on an eighth grader exhibiting behavioral and motivational problems. The School Counselor, 31(1), 83—86.
12.
Filter, K., Benedict, E., McKenna, M., Horner, R.H., Todd, A., & Watson, J. (in press). Check in/check out: An efficient, secondary intervention for reducing problem behaviors in schools. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
13.
Galloway, J., & Sheridan, S.M. (1994). Implementing scientific practices through case studies: Examples using home school interventions and consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 385—413.
14.
Gresham, F., & Elliot, S.N. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15.
Hawken, L., & Horner, R. (2004). CICO program acceptability questionnaire. Eugene: University of Oregon, Educational and Community Supports.
16.
Hawken, L.S., & Horner, R.H. (2003). Evaluation of a targeted intervention within a schoolwide system of behavior support. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 12, 225—240.
17.
Horner, R., Salantine, S., & Albin, R. (2003). Self assessment of contextual fit in schools. Eugene: University of Oregon, Educational and Community Supports.
18.
Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Todd, A.W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support: An alternative approach to discipline in schools. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Positive behavior support (pp. 359—390). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
Horner, R.H., Todd, A.W., Lewis-Palmer, T., Irvin, L.K., Sugai, G., & Boland, J.B. (2004). The School-wide evaluation tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 6, 3—12.
20.
Lewis, T.J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Effective School Practices , 17, 47—53.
21.
March, R.E., & Horner, R.H. (2002). Feasibility of contributions of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 158—171.
22.
March, R., Horner, R., Lewis-Palmer, T., Brown, D., Crone, D., Todd, A., et al. (2000). Functional assessment checklist for teachers and staff (FACTS). Eugene, OR: Educational and Community Supports.
23.
Metzler, C., Biglan, A., & Rusby, J. (2001). Evaluation of a comprehensive behavior management program to improve school wide positive behavior support. Education & Treatment of Children, 24, 448—479.
24.
Nelson, J.R., & Carr, B.A. (1996). The think time strategy for schools: Bringing order to the classroom. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
25.
Nelson, J.R., Martella, R.M., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 136—148.
26.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
27.
Oregon Statewide Assessment Program. (1999 ). Reading and literature, mathematics, science and social science . Salem: Oregon Department of Education .
28.
Schumaker, J.B., Hovell, M.F., & Sherman, J.A. (1977). An analysis of daily report cards and parent-managed privileges in the improvement of adolescents' classroom performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 449—464.
29.
Stein, D.B. (1999). A medication-free parent management program for children diagnosed as ADHD. Ethical Human Sciences and Services , 1(1), 61—79.
30.
Struckoff, P.M., McLaughlin, T.F., & Bialozor, R.C. (1987). The effects of a daily report card system in increasing homework completion and accuracy in a special education setting. Techniques,3, 19—26.
31.
Todd, A., Horner, R., Sugai, G., & Colvin, G. (1999). Individualizing school-wide discipline for students with chronic problem behaviors: A two level team approach. Effective School Practices, 17(4), 72—82.
32.
Todd, A.W., Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., & Sprague, J.R. (1999). Effective behavior support: Strengthening school-wide systems through a team-based approach. Effective School Practices , 17(4), 23—37.
33.
Walker, H., Severson, H., & Feil, E. (1998). First Steps to Success: Intervening at the point of school entry to prevent antisocial behavior patterns. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 259—269.
34.
Walker, H.M., Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J.R., Bricker, D., et al. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194—209.
