In this study, a sample of teachers was surveyed regarding their reported use and acceptability of daily behavior report cards (DBRCs). Almost two thirds of responding teachers indicated that they have used versions of DBRCs in their practice. Respondents' use of DBRCs was not restricted to a single purpose or situation. Additional findings suggested that the format of DBRCs varies widely, suggesting that teachers have found the DBRC to be highly adaptive in representing a broad array of possibilities rather than having a single, scripted purpose. An additional noteworthy finding relates to the general acceptance of DBRCs by teachers as both behavior-monitoring tools and as components in interventions. In summary, results provide support to previous claims that the DBRC is both a used and accepted tool in practice, suggesting that DBRCs deserve closer attention in research and practice related to positive behavior supports. Limitations, future directions, and implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, J., Wolf, M., & Phillips, E. (1970). Home-based reinforcement and the modification of predelinquents' classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 223—233.
2.
Blechman, E.A., Schrader, S.M., & Taylor, C.J. (1981). Family problem solving versus home notes as early intervention with high-risk children. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 49, 919—926.
3.
Chafouleas, S.M., McDougal, J.L., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Panahon, C.J., & Hilt, A.M. (2005). What do daily behavior report cards (DBRCs) measure?: An initial comparison with direction observation for off-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 669—676.
4.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., & McDougal, J. (2002). Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior report card rate?Psychology in the Schools, 39, 157—169.
5.
Chafouleas, S.M., Riley-Tillman, T.C., Sassu, K.A., LaFrance, M.J., & Patwa, S.S. (2004). Daily behavior report cards (DBRCs): An investigation of consistency of data across raters. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
Crone, D.A., Horner, R.H., & Hawken, L.S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
Dougherty, E.H., & Dougherty, A. (1977). The daily report card: A simplified and flexible package for classroom behavior management. In L. A. Hersov & M. Berger (Eds.), Aggression and antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence (pp. 73—93). London: Pergamon.
8.
Eckert, T.L., & Hintze, J.M. (2000). Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: Issues related to service delivery and research methodology. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 123—148.
9.
Eckert, T.L., Hintze, J.M., & Shapiro, E.S. (1999). Development and refinement of a measure for assessing the acceptability of assessment methods: The Assessment Rating Profile—Revised. CanadianJournal of School Psychology, 15, 21—42.
10.
Forgatch, M.S., & Ramsey, E. (1994). Boosting homework: A video tape link between families and schools. School Psychology Review, 23, 472—484.
11.
Lahey, B.B., Gendrich, J.G., Gendrich, S.I., Schnelle, J.F., Gant, D.S., & McNees, M.P. (1977). An evaluation of daily behavior report cards with minimal teacher and parent contacts as an efficient method of classroom intervention. Behavior Modification, 1, 381—394.
12.
McCain, A.P., & Kelley, M.L. (1993). Managing the classroom behavior of an ADHD preschooler: The efficacy of a school-home note intervention. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 15, 33—44.
13.
Moon, T.R., Brighton, C.M., & Callahan, C.M. (2003). State standardized testing programs: Friend or foe of gifted students?Roeper Review , 25, 47— 60.
14.
Nolan, E.E., & Gadow, K.D. (1994). Relation between ratings and observations of stimulant drug response in hyperactive children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 78—90.
15.
Pelham, W.E. (1993). Pharmacotherapy for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 22, 199—227.
16.
Riley-Tillman, T.C., & Chafouleas, S.M. (2003). Using interventions that exist in the natural environment to increase treatment integrity and social influence. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation , 14, 139— 156.
17.
Riley-Tillman, T.C., Chafouleas, S.M., Eckert, T.L., & Kelleher, C. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice: A framework for building research agendas in school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 459— 473.
18.
Schumaker, J.B., Hovell, M.F., & Sherman, J.A. (1977). An analysis of daily behavior report cards and parent-managed privileges in the improvement of adolescents' classroom performance . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 449—464.
19.
Shapiro, E.S., & Cole, C.L. (1994). Behavior change in the classroom: Self-management interventions. New York: Guilford Press.
20.
Steege, M.W., Davin, T., & Hathaway, M. (2001). Reliability and accuracy of a performance-based behavioral recording procedure. School Psychology Review, 30, 252—261.
21.
Turco, T.L., & Elliott, S.N. (1986). Students' acceptability ratings of interventions for classroom misbehaviors: A study of well-behaving and misbehaving youth . Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 281—289.
22.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education , 34, 58—68.
