The authors evaluated the effects of response cards on the disruptive behavior and academic responding of students in two urban fourth-grade classrooms. Two conditions, single-student responding and write-on response cards, were alternated in an ABAB design. During single-student responding, the teacher called on one student who had raised his or her hand to answer the question. During the response-card condition, each student was provided with a white laminated board on which he or she could write a response to every question posed by the teacher. Nine students were targeted for data collection because of their history of disciplinary issues in school and frequent disruptive behavior in the classroom. Data revealed substantial reductions in disruptive behavior and increases in academic responding during the response card condition compared to single-student responding. The findings are discussed in terms of the beneficial effects of direct, high-response strategies for urban, low-achieving learners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Greenwood, C.R. (1986). Environmental variables affecting the school achievement of culturally and linguistically different learners: An instructional perspective. NABE. The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 10(2), 113—135.
2.
Armendariz, F., & Umbreit, J. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(3), 152—158
3.
Billingsley, B.S. (2001). Beginning special educators: Characteristics, qualifications, and experiences. SPeNSE Summary Sheet. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467269).
4.
Billingsley, B.S., & Tomchin, E.M. (1992). Four beginning LD teachers: What their experiences suggest for trainers and employers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 104—112.
5.
Bullara, D.T. (1994). Effects of guided notes on the academic performance and off-task/disruptive behaviors of students with severe behavior handicaps during science instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
6.
Carnine, D.W. (1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199—206.
7.
Cavanaugh, R.A., Heward, W.L., & Donelson, F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403—406
8.
Christle, C.A., & Schuster, J.W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 12, 147—165
9.
Coleman, M., & Vaughn, S. (2000). Reading interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25(2), 93—104.
10.
Colvin, G.T., Greenberg, S., & Sherman, R. (1993). The forgotten variable: Improving academic skills for students with serious emotional disturbance. Effective School Practice, 12(1), 20—25.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Keeping good teachers. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6—77.
12.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people's children. New York: The New Press.
13.
Engelmann, S., & Colvin, G. (1983). Generalized compliance training: A direct-instruction program for managing severe behavior problems. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14.
Fimian, M.J., & Santoro, T.M. (1983). Sources and manifestations of occupational stress as reported by full-time special education teachers. Exceptional Children, 49, 540—543.
15.
Gardner, R., III, Heward, W.L., & Grossi, T.A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63—71.
16.
Greenwood, C.R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Carta, J.J. (1994). Identification and translation of effective teacher-developed instructional procedures for general practice. Remedial and Special Education, 15(3), 140—151.
17.
Hall, R.V., Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C.R., & Thurston, L. (1982). The importance of opportunity to respond in children's academic success. In E. B. Edgar, N. G. Haring, J. R. Jenkins , & C. G. Pious (Eds.), Mentally handicapped children: Education and training (pp. 107—140). Baltimore: University Park Press
18.
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). The social world of children learning to talk . Baltimore: Brookes
Heward, W.L. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283—320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
21.
Kellum, K.K., Carr, J.E., & Dozier, C.L. (2001). Response-card instruction and student learning in a college classroom. Teaching of Psychology ( Columbia, Mo.), 28, 101—104.
22.
Lo, Y., & Cartledge, G. (2004a). Office disciplinary referrals in an elementary school: Special issues for an urban population. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Lo, Y., & Cartledge, G. ( 2004b). Total class peer tutoring and interdependent group oriented contingency: Improving the academic and task related behaviors of fourth-grade urban students. Education & Treatment of Children.27, 235—262.
24.
Maheady, L., Michielli-Pendl, J., Mallette, B., & Harper, G.F. (2002). A collaborative research project to improve the academic performance of a diverse sixth grade science class. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 55—70.
25.
Muscott, H.S. (1987). Conceptualizing behavior management strategies for troubled and troubling students: A process for organizing the direction of intervention efforts in schools. The Pointer, 31, 15—22.
26.
Narayan, J.S., Heward, W.L., Gardner, R., III, Courson, F.H., & Omness, C.K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 23, 483—490.
27.
Pullis, M. (1992). An analysis of the occupational stress of teachers of the behaviorally disordered: Sources, effects, and strategies of coping . Behavioral Disorders, 17, 191—201.
28.
Sainato, D.M., Strain, P.S., & Lyon, S.R. (1987). Increasing academic responding of handicapped preschool children during group instruction. Journal of the Division for Early Children, 12(1), 23—30.
29.
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143—178.
