Although applied behavior analysis has made a significant contribution in the area of challenging behavior, to date, researchers have not systematically investigated the episodic severity of behavior as a dependent variable. Episodic severity is defined as the measure of intensity or gravity of a behavioral incident. Research up to now has investigated changes in behavior over time, but not the degree to or speed with which a behavioral incident can be safely resolved. As a result, practitioners have had to look beyond applied behavior analysis to emergency management systems such as Mandt, Nappi, CPI, and the like, which have not been empirically tested. This article proposes including episodic severity as an additional dependent variable to enhance the social validity of behavioral plans and discusses the resulting implications for new terms and strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albin, R.W., O'Brien, M., & Horner, R.H. (1995). Analysis of an escalating sequence of problematic behaviors: A case study. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 16(2), 133—147.
2.
Azrin, N. (1958). Some effects of noise on human behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,1, 183—200.
3.
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T. (1968). Current dimensions of applied behavior analysis . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91—97.
4.
Campbell, R.V., & Lutzker, J.R. (1993). Using functional equivalence training to reduce severe challenging behavior: A case study. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,5(3), 203—216.
5.
Carr, E.G., Doolabh, A., Horner, R.H., Marquis, J.G., McAtee, M.L., McLaughlin, D.M., et al. (1999). Positive behavioral support for people with developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
6.
Carr, E.G., & Durand, V.M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 18, 111—126.
7.
Catania, A.C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
8.
Cautela, J.R. (1984). General level of reinforcement. Journal ofBehavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 15(2), 109—114.
9.
Deitz, S.M., & Repp, A.C. (1973). Decreasing classroom behavior through the use of DRL schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 457—463.
10.
Deitz, S.M., Slack, D.J., Schwarzmueller, E.B., Wilander, A.P., Weatherly, T.J., & Hilliard, G. (1978). Reducing inappropriate behavior in special classrooms by reinforcing average inter-response times: Interval DRL. Behavior Therapy, 9, 37—46.
11.
Diorio, M.S., & Konarski, E.A. (1989). Effects of a freely available response on the schedule performance of mentally retarded persons. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93(4), 373—379.
12.
Durand, V.M. (1990). Severe behavior problems: A functional communicative approach. New York: Guilford Press .
13.
Ferster, C.B., & Skinner, B.F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
14.
Goldiamond, I. (1974). Toward a constructional approach to social problems: Ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behaviorism,2, 1—85.
15.
Goldiamond, I. (1975). Alternative sets as a framework for behavioral formulations and research. Behaviorism,3(1), 49—86.
16.
Gordon, T. (1970). Parent effectiveness training. New York: Wyden.
17.
Hawkins, R.P., & Dobes, R.W. (1977). Behavioral definitions in applied behavior analysis: Explicit or implicit? In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method, and application (pp. 167—188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Horner, R.H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 401—404.
19.
Iwata, B. A., Bailey, J. S., Neef, N. A., Wacker, D. P., Repp, A. C., & Shook, G. L. (Eds.). (1996). Behavior analysis in developmental disabilities (3rd ed.). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis Reprint Series, 1.
20.
Iwata, B.A., Pace, G.M., Kissel, R.C., Nau, P.A., & Farber, J.M. (1990). The Self-Injury Trauma (SIT) Scale: A method for quantifying surface tissue damage caused by self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(23), 99—110.
21.
Jason, L.A., & Liotta, R.F. (1982). Reduction of cigarette smoking in a university cafeteria. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 573—577.
22.
Johnston, J.M., & Pennypacker, H.S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Kahng, S.W., Iwata, B.A., Thompson, R.H., & Hanley, G.P. (2000). A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under non-contingent reinforcement schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 419—432.
24.
Kazdin, A.E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification , 1, 427—451.
25.
LaVigna, G.W., & Donnellan, A.M. (1986). Alternative to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington Publishers.
LaVigna, G.W., & Willis, T.J. (2003). Counter-intuitive strategies for crisis management within a non-aversive framework. In D. Allen (Ed.), Behaviour management in intellectual disabilities: Ethical responses to challenging behavior (pp. 89—103). Kidderminster : British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
28.
LaVigna, G.W., Willis, T.J., & Donnellan, A.M. (1989). The role of positive programming in behavioral treatment. In E. Cipani (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorders. Monographs of theAmerican Association on Mental Retardation, 12, 59—83.
29.
Leitenberg, H., Agras, S.W., Thompson, L.E., & Wright, D.E. (1968). Feedback in behavior modification: An experimental analysis in two phobic cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,1, 131—137.
30.
Lerman, D.C., & Iwata, B.A. (1995). Prevalence of the extinction burst and its attenuation during treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 93—94.
31.
Lerman, D.C., Iwata, B.A., & Wallace, M.D. (1999). Side effects of extinction: Prevalence of bursting and aggression during the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 1—8.
32.
Lovaas, O.I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The me book. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
33.
Luce, S.C., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R.V. (1980) Contingent exercise: A mild but powerful procedure for suppressing inappropriate verbal and aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 583—594.
34.
Luiselli, J., & Cameron, M. (1999). Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support. Baltimore: Brookes.
35.
Maguire, K.B., Lange, B., Scherling, M., & Grow, R. (1996). The use of rehearsal and positive reinforcement in the dental treatment of uncooperative patients with mental retardation . Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,8(2), 167—177
36.
Malott, R.W., Whaley, D.L., & Malott, M.E. (1997). Elementary principles of behavior (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
Neufeld, A., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (1987). Treatment of severe self-injurious behavior by the mentally retarded using the bubble helmet and differential reinforcement. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 18, 127—136.
O'Leary, K.D., Kaufman, K.F., Kass, R.E., & Drabman, R.S. (1970). The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analyis,37, 145—155.
40.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., Storey, K., & Newton, J.S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole .
41.
Pierce, W.D., & Epling, W.F. (1995). Behavior analysis and learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
Poling, A., & Normand, M. (1999). Noncontingent reinforcement: An inappropriate description of time-based schedules that reduce behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 237—238.
43.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books.
44.
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Tucker, M., Sigafoos, J., & Bushell, H. (1998). Use of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of challenging behavior. Behavior Modification, 22, 529—547.
47.
Van Houten, R., Nau, P.A., MacKenzie-Keating, S.E., Sameoto, D., & Colavecchia, B. (1982). An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 65—83.
48.
Van Houten, R., & Rolider, A. (1989). An analysis of several variables influencing the efficacy of flash card instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 111—118.
49.
Vargas, J.S. (1977). Behavioral psychology for teachers. New York: Harper & Row.
50.
Vollmer, T.R. (1993). The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self injurious behavior: Non-contingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 9—21.
51.
Vollmer, T. R., Iwata, B. A., Cuvo, A. J., Heward, W. L., Miltenberger, R. G., & Neef, N. A. (Eds.). (2000). Behavior analysis: Applications and extensions (1968—1999). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis Reprint Series, 5.
52.
Williams, C.D. (1959). The elimination of tantrum behavior by extinction procedures. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 269.
53.
Willis, T.J., LaVigna, G.W., & Donnellan, A.M. (1993). Behavior assessment guide . Los Angeles: The Institute for Applied Behavior Analysis.
54.
Wolf, M.M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203—214.
