The fundamental feature that distinguishes positive behavior support (PBS) from previous generations of applied behavior analysis is its focus on the remediation of deficient contexts that are determined to be the source of the problem. Determining this source involves conducting a functional assessment. This innovative practices article presents the argument that if professionals are to be successfully address issues pertaining to the context of problem behaviors, they must incorporate the perspectives and knowledge of people receiving behavioral supports into the functional assessment process. The authors report the results of a pilot examination of a person-guided functional assessment and present ideas for enhancing consumer involvement in the functional assessment process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agran, M., Blanchard, C., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student-directed learning: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 351—364.
2.
Baker, D.J., Reichle, J., & Boyer, A. (1997). Communicative agreement between spoken utterances and actions among persons with mild-to-moderate mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 32, 49—58.
3.
Carr, E.G., Horner, R.H., Turnbull, A.P., Marquis, J.G., McLaughlin, D.M., McAtee, M.L., et al. (2000). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
4.
Dunlap, G., DePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., et al. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505—518.
5.
Lucyshyn, J.M., Blumberg, E.R., & Irvin, L.K. (2001). Transforming coercive relationships in family routines. Public Health ServiceGrants. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
6.
Munk, D.D., & Repp, A.C. (1994). The relationship between instructional variables and problem behavior: A review. Exceptional Children, 60, 390— 401.
7.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., Storey, K., & Newton, J.S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
8.
Reed, H., Thomas, E., Sprague, J.R., & Horner, R.H. (1997). The Student-Guided Functional Assessment Interview: An analysis of student and teacher agreement. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 7, 33—49.
9.
Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Gregory, N., Kessissoglou, S., Hallam, A., et al. (2001). Environmental opportunities and supports for exercising self-determination in community-based residential settings . Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 487—502.
10.
Stancliffe, R. (1997). Community living-unit size, staff presence, and residents' choice-making. Mental Retardation, 35, 1—9.
11.
Stancliffe, R., & Abery, B. (1997). Longitudinal study of deinstitutionalization and the exercise of choice. Mental Retardation, 35, 159—169.
12.
Stancliffe, R., Abery, B., & Smith, J. (2000). Personal control and the ecology of community living settings: Beyond living-unit size and type. Mental Retardation, 105, 431—454.
13.
Stancliffe, R., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (1995). Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation. TheJournal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 319—328.
14.
Wehmeyer, M.L. (2001). Self-determination and mental retardation. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research mental retardation (Vol. 24, pp. 1—48). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behaviors of adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632—642.
16.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Metzler, C.A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111—119.
17.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S., Agran, M., Mithaug, D., & Martin, J. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439—453.
