This study examined the structure of items on commonly used behavior rating scales in order to determine their usefulness in planning and monitoring positive interventions. Fourteen forms from 9 published behavior rating scales commonly used in research and practice were selected. The items on each scale were categorized as addressing a positive action, a negative action, a lack of positive action, or a lack of negative action. Ten of the 14 scales were composed of a majority of negative action questions, which are not useful for assessing positive behaviors. Thirteen included lack-of-action questions, which indicates they do not address observable, measurable behaviors. Implications for the selection and use of behavior rating scales within the context of a proactive model of social intervention, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
* Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Child behavior checklist/4-18. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry .
2.
* Achenbach, T.M. (2001). Teacher's report form for ages 5-18. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry .
3.
Achenbach, T.M., & McConaughy, S.H. (1998). School-based practitioners' guide for the Child Behavior Checklist and related forms. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry .
4.
Batsche, G.M., & Knoff, H.M. (1995). Best practices in linking assessment to intervention . In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology III (pp. 569—585). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
* Burks, H.F. (1977). Burks' behavior rating scales. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
7.
Cairns, E., & Green, J. (1979). How to assess personality and social patterns: Observations or ratings? In R. Cairns (Ed.), The analysis of social interactions (pp. 209—226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago : Rand McNally.
10.
* Epstein, M., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
11.
Fox, L., Dunlap, G., & Cushing, L. (2002). Early intervention, positive behavior support, and transition to school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 149—157.
Gresham, F. (2002). Best practices in social skills training. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 1029—1040). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
14.
* Gresham, F., & Elliott, S. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15.
HaileMariam, A., Bradley-Johnson, S., & Johnson, C.M. (2002). Pediatricians' preferences for ADHD information from schools. School Psychology Review, 31, 94—105.
16.
Hardman, M.L., Drew, C.J., & Egan, M.W. (2002). Human exceptionality: Society, school, and family (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Heckaman, K., Conroy, M., East, J., & Chait, A. (2000). Functional assessment-based intervention research on students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 196—210.
18.
Hintze, J.M., Volpe, R.J., & Shapiro, E.S. (2002). Best practices in the systematic direct observation of student behavior. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 993—1006). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
19.
Hosp, J., & Reschly, D. (2002). Regional differences in school psychology practice . School Psychology Review, 31, 11—29.
20.
Howell, K., & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA : Wadsworth.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (26).
23.
* Kamphaus, R.W., & Reynolds, C.R. (1998). BASC (behavior assessment system for children) monitor. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
24.
Kaplan, J.S. (2000). Beyond functional assessment: A social-cognitive approach to the evaluation of behavior problems in children and youth. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25.
Knowles, E.S. (1988). Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 55, 312—320.
26.
Martin, R. (1988). Assessment of personality and behavior problems: Infancy through adolescence. New York: Guilford.
27.
McCarney, S.B. (1994). The behavior evaluation scale—2: School version technical manual. Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
28.
McConaughy, S., & Achenbach, T. (1989). Empirically based assessment of serious emotional disturbance. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 91—117.
29.
McConaughy, S., & Ritter, D. (2002). Best practices in multidimensional assessment of emotional or behavioral disorders. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 1303—1336). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
30.
McGinnis, E., Kiraly, J., & Smith, C. (1984). The types of data used in identifying public school students as behaviorally disordered. Behavioral Disorders , 9, 239—246.
31.
Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Carroll, A. (2002). A review of the research on interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: What works best?Review of Educational Research, 72, 61—100.
32.
* Quay, H.C., & Peterson, D.R. (1987). Revised behavior problem checklist. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami, Department of Psychology.
33.
Reid, R., & Maag, J. (1994). How many fidgets in a pretty much: A critique of behavior rating scales for identifying students with ADHD. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 339—354.
34.
* Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
35.
Robbins, R., & Merrill, K. (1998). Cross informant comparisons of the home and community social behavior scales and the school behavior scales. Diagnostique , 23, 204—218.
36.
Ross, D., & Ross, S. (1982). Hyperactivity: Current issues, research, and theory (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Upah, K.R.F., & Tilly, D.W. (2002). Best practices in designing, implementing and evaluating quality interventions. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 483—501). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
39.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (2000). Elementary and secondary school civil rights compliance report. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
Vogt, W.P. (1999). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
* Walker, H.M., & McConnell, S.R. (1995). The Walker-McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustment. San Diego: Singular.
43.
Wilczenski, F.L., & Ferguson, T. (2001). School independence measure: Conceptual framework and use with children with ADHD. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456595)
44.
Wilson, M., & Bullock, L. (1989). Psychometric characteristics of behavior rating scales: Definitions, problems, and solutions. Behavioral Disorders , 14, 186—200.
