Although positive behavior support (PBS) approaches are often cited as influencing systems, families, and individuals beyond changes in problem or alternative behavior, very few studies have directly assessed issues related to the social validity of these approaches. In response to this need, the Tri-State Consortium for Positive Behavior Support systematically evaluated broad ecological outcomes including behavioral outcomes and quality of life outcomes as measured through team members' ratings. Results of assessments of 78 initial child-centered teams indicate that the PBS approach had an important impact on multiple levels. This article discusses some specific areas of impact and highlights areas for future research on measuring behavioral outcomes, quality of life, and social validity issues relevant to PBS.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albin, R.W., Lucyshyn, J.M., Horner, R.H., & Flannery, K.B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans: A model for "goodness of fit." In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 81-98). Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Burgi, S.R. (1999). My sister is a dinosaur. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 187.
3.
Carr, E.G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R.H., Koegel, R.L., Turnbull, A.P., Sailor, W., et al. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 4, 4-16.
4.
Carr, E.G., Horner, R.H., Turnbull, A.P., Marquis, J.G., McLaughlin, D.M., McAtee, M.L., et al. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
5.
Carr, E.G., Levin, L., McConnachie, G., Carlson, J.I., Kemp, D.C., Smith, C.G., et al. (1999). Comprehensive multisituational intervention for problem behavior in the community: Long-term maintenance and social validation . Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 5-25.
6.
Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Knoster, T., Fox, L., Anderson, J., & Albin, R.W. (2000). Essential elements of inservice training in positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 2, 22-32.
7.
Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement . Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 51-74.
8.
Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1996). Assessment of quality of life. In R. L. Schalock (Ed.), Quality of life Vol. 1. Conceptualization and measurement (pp. 91-104). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
9.
Goode, D.A. (1991). Quality of life research: A change agent for persons with disabilities. Paper presented to the American Association on Mental Retardation National Meeting Round Table Program, Washington, DC.
10.
Halpern, A.S., Nave, G., Close, D.W., & Wilson, D. (1986). An empirical analysis of the dimensions of community adjustment for adults with mental retardation in semi-independent living programs . Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities , 12(3), 147-157.
11.
Horner, R.H., & Carr, E.G. (1997). Behavior support for students with severe disabilities: Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 84-104.
12.
Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R.L., Carr, E.G., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., et al. (1990). Toward a technology of "nonaversive" behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 125-132.
13.
Kincaid, D. (1996). Person-centered planning. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 439-465). Baltimore: Brookes .
14.
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Dunlap, G. (Eds.). (1996). Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Brookes.
15.
Koegel, L.K., Koegel, R.L., Harrower, J.K., & Carter, C.M. (1999). Pivotal response intervention. I: Overview of approach. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24(3), 174-185.
16.
Lucyshyn, J.M., & Albin, R.W. (1993). Comprehensive support to families of children with disabilities and behavior problems: Keeping it "friendly." In G. H. S. Singer & L. E. Powers (Eds.), Families, disability, and empowerment: Active coping skills and strategies for family interventions (pp. 365-408). Baltimore: Brookes.
17.
Meyer, L., & Evans, I.M. (1989). Nonaversive interventions for behavior problems: A manual for home and community. Baltimore: Brookes.
18.
Parmenter, T. (1988). An analysis of the dimensions of quality of life for people with physical disabilities. In R. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for handicapped people (pp. 7-36). London: Croom Helm.
19.
Parmenter, T.R. (1992). Quality of life of people with developmental disabilities . In N. W. Bray (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 160-172). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Risley, T. (1996). Get a life!: Positive behavior intervention for challenging behavior through life arrangement and life coaching. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 425-437). Baltimore: Brookes .
21.
Schalock, R.L. (1999). Three decades of quality of life. In M. Wehmeyer & J. R. Patton (Eds.), Mental retardation in the 21st century . Austin: PRO-ED.
22.
Schalock, R.L. (2001). Outcome based evaluation. New York: Plenum.
23.
Schalock, R.L., Bonham, G.S., & Marchland, C.B. (2000). Consumer based quality of life assessment: A path model of perceived satisfaction. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(1), 77-87.
24.
Schalock, R.L., & Keith, K.D. (1993). Quality of life questionnaire. Worthington, OH: IDS.
25.
Scotti, J. R., & Meyer, L. H. (Eds.). (1999). Behavioral intervention: Principles, models, and practices. Baltimore: Brookes.
26.
Todd, A.W., Horner, R.H., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effects of self-monitoring and self-recruited praise on problem behavior, academic engagement, and work completion in a typical classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 1, 66-76.
