Children with autism often engage in problem behavior that can be highly disruptive to ongoing family practices and routines. This case study demonstrated child and family outcomes related to two distinct treatment approaches for challenging behavior (prescriptive vs. contextualized) in a family raising a child with autism. The processes of behavior change directed either solely by the interventionist (prescriptive) and in collaboration with the family (contextualized) were compared. The family-directed intervention involved an assessment of family context (i.e., via discussion of daily routines) to inform the design of a behavioral support plan. Information gathered from the assessment of family routines was used to (a) help select specific behavioral strategies that were compatible with family characteristics and preferences, and (b) construct teaching methods that fit with the family's ongoing practices, routines, and interaction goals. More favorable results (i.e., reductions in challenging behavior, an increase in on-task behavior) were observed within the contextualized treatment-planning phase than were observed within the prescriptive treatment-planning phase. The procedures and results are discussed in relation to the emerging literature documenting the importance of contextualizing behavioral supports applied within family settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albin, R.W., Lucyshyn, J.M., Horner, R.H., & Flannery, K.B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans: A model for "goodness of fit." In R. L. Koegel, L. K. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 81-98). Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Arndorfer, R., Mitlenberger, R., Woster, S., Rortvedt, A., & Gaffaney, T. (1994). Home-based descriptive and experimental analysis of problem behaviors in children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 64-87.
3.
Bernheimer, L.P., & Keogh, B.K. (1995). Weaving interventions into the fabric of everyday life: An approach to family assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 415-433.
4.
Carr, E.G., Carlson, J.I., Langdon, N.A., Magito-McLaughlin, D., & Yarbrough, S.C. (1998). Two perspectives on antecedent control. In J. K. Luiselli & M. J. Cameron (Eds.), Antecedent control (pp. 3-28). Baltimore: Brookes.
5.
Carr, E.G., Reeve, C.E., & Magito-McLaughlin, D. (1996). Contextual influences on problem behavior in people with developmental disabilities. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 403-423). Baltimore: Brookes .
6.
Cipani, E., & Spooner, F. (1997). Treating problem behaviors maintained by negative reinforcement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 329-342.
7.
Dennis, R.E., Williams, W., Giangreco, M.F., & Cloniger, C.J. (1993). Quality of life as context for planning and evaluation of services for people with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 499-512.
8.
Derby, K.M., Wacher, D.P., Berg, W., DeRaad, A., Ulrich, S., Asmus, J., Harding, J.Prouty, A., Laffey, P., & Stoner, E.A. (1997). The long-term effects of functional communication training in home settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 30, 507-531.
9.
Dunlap, G., & Fox, L. (1996). Early intervention and serious problem behavior: A comprehensive approach. In L. K. Koegel , R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 31-50). Baltimore : Brookes.
10.
Dunlap, G., Fox, L., Vaughn, B.J., Bucy, M., & Clarke ( 1997). In quest of meaningful perspectives on outcomes: A response to five commentaries. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 221-223.
11.
Dunlap, G., Vaughn, B.J., & O'Neill, R. (1998). Comprehensive behavioral support: Application and intervention. In A. M. Wetherby, S. F. Warren, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Transition in pre-linguistic communication (pp. 343-364).
12.
Durand, V.M., & Carr, E.G. (1991). Functional communication training to reduce challenging behavior: Maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 251-264.
13.
Fox, L., Dunlap, G., & Philbrick, L.A. (1997). Providing individualized supports to young children with autism and their families. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 1-14.
14.
Frea, W.D., & Hepburn, S.L. (1999). Teaching parents of children with autism to perform functional assessments to plan interventions for extremely disruptive behaviors . Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 112-116.
15.
Griest, D.L., & Forehand, R. (1982). How can I get any parent training done with all these other problems going on? The role of family variables in child behavior therapy. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 4, 73-80.
16.
Horner, R.H., & Carr, E.G. (1997). Behavior support for students with severe disabilities: Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 84-104.
17.
Koegel, R.L., Koegel, L.K., & Dunlap, G. (1996). Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Baltimore: Brookes.
18.
Lalli, J.S., Casey, S., & Kates, K. (1995). Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 261-268.
19.
Lucyshyn, J.M., & Albin, R.W. (1993). Comprehensive support to families of children with disabilities and behavior problems: Keeping it friendly. In G. H. S. Singer & L. E. Powers (Eds.), Families, disability, and empowerment: Active coping skills and strategies for family interventions (pp. 365-407).
20.
Lucyshyn, J.M., Albin, R.W., & Nixon, C.D. (1997). Embedding comprehensive behavioral support in family ecology: An experimental, single-case analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 241-251.
21.
McConnachie, G., & Carr, E.G. (1997). The effects of child behavior problems on the maintenance of intervention fidelity. Behavior Modification , 21, 123-158.
22.
Moes, D. (1995). Parenting stress and parent education. In R. Koegel & L. Koegel (Eds.), Teaching children with autism (pp. 79-94). Baltimore: Brookes.
23.
Nihira, K., Weisner, T.S., Bernheimer, & L.P. (1994). Ecocultural assessment in families of children with developmental delays: Construct and concurrent validities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 551-566.
24.
O'Donnell, C.R., Tharp, R.G., & Wilson, K. (1993). Activity settings as the unit of analysis: A theoretical basis for community intervention and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 501-520.
25.
Piazza, C.C., Moes, D.R., & Fisher, W.W. (1996). Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior and demand fading in the treatment of escaped-maintained destructive behavior . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 569-572.
26.
Robbins, F.R., Dunlap, G., & Plienis, A.J. (1991). Family characteristics, family training, and the progress of young children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention , 15, 173-184.
27.
Simeonsson, R.J., Bailey, D.B., Huntington, G.S., & Comfort, M. (1986). Testing the concept of goodness of fit in early intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal, 7, 81-94.
28.
Singer, G. H. S, & Irvin, L.K. (1991). Supporting families of persons with severe disabilities: Emerging findings, practices, and questions. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of persons with severe disabilities (pp. 271-312). Baltimore: Brookes.
29.
Trivette, C.M., Dunst, C.J., Deal, A.G., Hamer, A.W., & Propst, S. (1990). Assessing family strengths and family functioning style. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 16-35.
30.
Vaughn, B.J., Clarke, S., & Dunlap, G. (1997). Assessment-based intervention for severe behavior problems in a natural family context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 713-716.
