American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 19-26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Chelimsky, E. (1987). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation?Evaluation Practice, 8, 5-21.
3.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Mowbray, C. T. (1988). Getting the system to respond to evaluation findings. In J. A. McLaughlin, I. J. Weber, R. W. Covert, & R. B. Ingle (Eds.), Evaluation utilization. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 39, 47-58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Posavac, E. J. (1994). Misusing program evaluation by asking the wrong question. In C. J. Stevens & M. Dial (Eds.), Preventing the misuse of evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 64, 69-78. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1992). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Preskill, H., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Current and developing conceptions of use: Evaluation Use TIG survey results. Evaluation Practice, 18, 209-225.
8.
Russ-Eft, D. (1986). Evaluability assessment of the Adult Education Program (AEP): The results and their use. Evaluation and Program Planning, 9, 39-47.
9.
Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Vroom, P. I., Colombo, M., & Nahan, N. (1994). Confronting ideology and self-interest: Avoiding misuse of evaluation. In C. J. Stevens & M. Dial (Eds.), Preventing the misuse of evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 64, 49-59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
