In 1997, the Board of Directors of the American Evaluation Association received a report from a Task Force that examined the potential of certifying evaluators. Key topics in the report are summarized here. These include: a clarification of relevant terms, a review of the status of evaluation as a profession, and a discussion of how other professions certify their practitioners. Future options are discussed. One option, that of maintaining the status quo (i.e., no action in regard to certification), was seen by the Task Force as having serious, long-term consequences for evaluation. A preliminary look is taken at the advantages and disadvantages of developing a process to certify evaluators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altschuld, J. W. (1981). Evaluation curricula-the urgent need. CEDR Quarterly, 14, 17-20.
2.
Altschuld, J. W. (Ed.) (1991). Educational evaluation: An evolving field. Theory into Practice, 30(1).
3.
Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Developing an evaluation program: Challenges in the teaching of evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 259-265.
4.
Altschuld, J. W. (1996). Initial ideas and thoughts about certification for evaluators. Memorandum to L. Bickman and the Board of Directors of the American Evaluation Association.
5.
Altschuld, J. W. (1997). Certification of evaluators: Draft report. Report submitted to the Board of Directors of the American Evaluation Association.
6.
Altschuld, J. W., Engle, M., Cullen, C., Kim, I., & Macce, B. R. (1994). The 1994 directory of evaluation training programs. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 71-94. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice—increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
8.
Bennett, C. F. (1979). Analyzing impacts of extension programs. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture.
9.
Carson, R. A. (1991). Medical practice as a public trust. Texas Medicine/The Journal, 87, 87-92.
10.
Cleary, H. (1995). The credentialing of health educators: An historical account 1970-1990. New York: NCHEC.
11.
Connor, R. F., Clay, T., & Hill, P. (1980). Directory of evaluation training. Washington, DC: Pintail Press.
12.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
13.
Fitzpatrick, J. (1994). Alternative models for the structuring of professional preparation programs. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 41-50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Gephart, W. J., & Potter, W. J. (1976). Evaluation training catalog. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
15.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Evaluating training programs. Madison, WI: American Society for Training and Development.
17.
Louisiana State Department of Education. (1996). Certification criteria for education program evaluators. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Department of Education.
18.
Love, A. (1994). Should evaluators be certified? In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 29-40. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Low, J. F. (1992). Another look at licensure: Consumer protection or professional protectionism?The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 373-376.
20.
May, R. M., Fleischer, M., Scheirer, C. J., & Cox, G. B. (1986). Directory of evaluation training programs. In B. G. Davis (Ed.), Teaching of evaluation across the disciplines. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 29, 71-98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Mertens, D. (1994). Training evaluators: Unique skills and knowledge. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 17-28. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Morell, J. A., & Flaherty, E. W. (1978). The development of evaluation as a profession: Current status and some predictions. Journal of Evaluation and Program Planning, 1, 11-17.
23.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). The challenge of being a profession. Evaluation Practice, 11, 45-51.
24.
Saunders R., & Bickman, L. (1995). Certification of evaluators. Memorandum submitted to the Board of the American Evaluation Association.
25.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Triplett, S. E. (1982). Implementation of the certification of Louisiana educational evaluators using the joint committee standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, New York.
27.
Trochim, W. M. K., & Riggin, L. (1996). AEA accreditation report (Draft). Report submitted to the Board of the American Evaluation Association.
28.
Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone. The American Journal of Sociology, 70(2).
29.
Worthen, B. R. (1972). Certification for educational evaluators: Problems and potential. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
30.
Worthen, B. R. (1987). Certification of measurement professionals: Arguments pro and con. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. Washington, DC.
31.
Worthen, B. R. (1994). Is evaluation a mature profession that warrants the preparation of evaluation professionals? In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 3-16. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1991). The changing face of educational evaluation. In J. W. Altschuld (Ed.), Educational evaluation: An evolving field. Theory Into Practice, 30(1), 3-12.
