The combination of programmatic theory and structural equation modeling (SEM) can act as the basic intellectual machinery for designing and evaluating behavioral interventions. As an example of the integration, we consider a case study of a randomized experiment to reduce sexual risk taking, the WINGS Project. Barriers to combining systematic use of SEM with programmatic theory for program improvement and assessing program effectiveness are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbuckle, J. (1997). AMOS user’s guide 3.6. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.
2.
Bandura, A. (1992). A social cognitive approach to the exercise of control over AIDS infection. In R. DiClemente (Ed.), Adolescents and AIDS. (pp. 89-116). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Chen, H-T., Quane J., Garland, T., & Marcin, P. (1988). Evaluating an antismoking program: Diagnostics of underlying causal mechanisms. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 11, 441-464.
4.
Chen, H-T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
6.
Crease, R. P., & Mann, C. C. (1986). The second creation. New York: Macmillan.
7.
Dumka, L., Roosa, M., Michaels, M., & Suh, K. (1995) Using research and theory to develop prevention programs for high risk families. Family Relations, 44, 78-86.
8.
Duncan, O. D. (1975). An introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W.A. (1992). Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 455-474.
10.
Fitzpatrick, J. (1988). Roles of the evaluator in innovative programs. Evaluation Review, 12, 449-461.
11.
Greenberg, J., Lifshay, J., Van Devanter, J., Gonzales, V., & Celentano D. (1998). Preventing HIV infection: The effects of community linkages, time, and money on recruiting and retaining women in intervention groups. Journal of Women’s Health, 7, 587-596.
12.
Greenberg, J., Hennessy, M., MacGowan, R., Celetano, D., Gonzales, V., VanDevanter, N., & Lifshay, J. (1999). Structural equation modeling of intervention efficacy for high-risk women: The WINGS project. Behavioral Interventions and Research Branch, Division of STD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.
13.
Hayduk, L. A. (1996). LISREL: Issues, debates, and strategies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Hennessy, M., & Grella, C. (1992). Evaluating innovative programs for homeless persons: Case study of an unsuccessful proposal. Evaluation Practice, 13, 15-25.
15.
Hox, J. (1995). Software review: AMOS, EQS, and LISREL for windows. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 79-90.
16.
Jemmott, J. B., Jemmott, L. S., & Fong, G. T. (1992). Reductions in HIV risk-associated sexual behaviors among black male adolescents: Effects of an AIDS prevention intervention. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 372-377.
17.
Jessor, R. (1991). Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health, 12, 597-605.
18.
Judge, G. G., Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., Lutkepohl, H., & Lee, T-C. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Kelly, J. A., St. Lawrence, J. S., Hood, H. V., & Brasfield, T. L. (1989). Behavioral intervention to reduce AIDS risk activities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 60-67.
20.
Kennedy, P. (1992). A guide to econometrics. Boston: MIT Press.
21.
Kline, R. (1998a). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
22.
Kline, R. (1998b). Software programs for structural equation models: AMOS, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16, 343-364.
23.
Lipsey, M. W. (1993). Theory as method: small theories of treatments. In L. B. Sechrest & A. G. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them. New Directions in Program Evaluation, 57, 5-38. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
25.
Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
McClintock, C. (1990). Evaluators as applied theorists. Evaluation Practice, 11, 1-12.
27.
McCusker, J., Stoddard, A. M., Zapka, J. G., & Lewis, B. F. (1993). Behavioral outcomes of AIDS educational interventions for drug users in short-term treatment. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1463-1466.
28.
Rossi, P., Berk, R., & Lenihan, K. (1980). Money, work, and crime. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Koopman, C., & Haignere, C. (1991). Reducing HIV sexual risk behaviors among runaway adolescents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 1237-1241.
30.
Schilling, R. F., El-Basel, B. N., Schinke, S. P., Gordon, K., & Nichols S. (1991). Building skills of recovering women drug users to reduce heterosexual AIDS transmission. Public Health Reports, 106, 297-304.
31.
Schumaker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Short, L., & Hennessy, M. (1994). Using structural equations to estimate the effects of behavioral interventions. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 68-81.
33.
Short, L., Hennessy, M., & Campbell, J. (1996). Tracking the work: A guide for communities in developing useful program evaluations. Chapter 5 of A guide for communities: building an integrated approach for reducing family violence (pp. 59-72). Chicago: American Medical Association.
34.
Smith, M. (1990). Evaluability assessment: Reflections on the process. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 359-364.
35.
Smith, M. (1989). Evaluability assessment: A practical approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
36.
Smith, N. L. (1990). Using path analysis to develop and evaluate program theory and impact. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Advances in program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 47, 53-57. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Valdiserri, R. O., Lyter, D., Leviton, L., Callahan, C. N., Kingsley, L. A., & Rinaldo, D. R. (1989). AIDS prevention in homosexual and bisexual men: Results of a randomized trial evaluating two risk reduction interventions. AIDS, 3, 21-26.
38.
VanRyn, M., & Vinokur, A. (1992). How did it work? An examination of the mechanisms through which an intervention for the unemployed promoted job-search behavior. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 577-597.
39.
Weiss, C. H. (1997). How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway?Evaluation Review, 21, 501-524.
40.
West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (1997). Toward understanding individual effects in multicomponent prevention programs: Design and analysis strategies. In K. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. West (Eds.), The science of prevention. (pp. 167-209). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
