Obtaining Active Parental Consent for Evaluation Research: A Case Study

Abstract

This study assesses the effectiveness of a strategy for obtaining active written parental consent for the outcome evaluation of an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug (ATOD) abuse prevention program. A local school-based strategy that was implemented in 16 middle schools in ten rural and suburban school districts is presented. Using a multiple case study approach and an adequacy of performance analysis, it was found that seven of the ten districts achieved a minimum consent rate goal set at 70% (ranged from 53% to 85%, average rate of 72%). Only two districts achieved a desired consent rate of 80%. Interviews with a key contact person in each school district provided profile information that distinguished districts that were successful in implementing an active parental consent strategy from those that were not successful. A cost effectiveness analysis showed that this local school-based strategy for obtaining parental consent for program evaluation was more cost effective than in previous studies. However, more than 20% of the data collection costs involved obtaining active written consent. Methodological and practical implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderman, C. , Cheadle, A. , Curry, S. , & Diehr, P. (1995). Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based survey research. Evaluation Review, 19 (6), 663-674.

Cross, H. D. (1994). An adolescent health and lifestyle guidance system. Adolescence, 29 (114), 267-277.

Dent, C. W. , Galaif, J. , Sussman, S. , & Stacy, A. (1993). Demographic, psychosocial and behavioral differences in samples of actively and passively consented adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 51-56.

Dent, C. W. , Sussman, S. Y. , & Stacy, A. W. (1997). The impact of a written parental consent policy on estimates from a school-based drug use survey. Evaluation Review, 21(6), 698-712.

Ellickson, P. L. (1989). Limiting nonresponse in longitudinal research: Three strategies for school-based studies. A Rand note. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.

Ellickson, P. L. (1994). Getting and keeping schools and kids for evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology CSAP Special Issue, 102-116.

Ellickson, P. L. , & Hawes, J. A. (1989). An assessment of active versus passive methods for obtaining parental consent. Evaluation Review, 13(1), 45-55.

Gensheimer, L. K. , Ayers, T. S. , & Roosa, M. W. (1993). School-based preventive interventions for at-risk populations: Practical and ethical issues. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16(2), 159-167.

H. R. 1271, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. (1995).

10.

Harrington, K. F. , Binkley, D. , Reynolds, K. D. , Duvall, R. C. , Copeland, J. R. , Franklin, F. & Racqynski, J. (1997). Recruitment issues in school based research: Lessons learned from the High 5 Alabama Project. Journal of School Health, 67(10), 415-421.

11.

Kearney, K. A. , Hopkins, R. H. , Mauss, A. L. , & Weisheit, R. A. (1983). Sample bias resulting from a requirement for written parental consent. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 96-102.

12.

Lueptow, L. , Mueller, S. A. , Hammes, R.R. , & Master, L.S. (1977). The impact of informed consent regulations on response rate and response bias. Sociological Methods and Research, 6(2), 83-104.

13.

Moberg, D. P. , & Piper, D. L. (1990). Obtaining active parental consent via telephone in adolescent substance abuse prevention research. Evaluation Review, 14(3), 315-323.

14.

Noll, R. B. , Zeller, M. H. , Vannatta, K. , Bukowski, W. M. , & Davies, W. H. (1997). Potential bias in classroom research: Comparision of children with permission and those who do not receive permission to participate. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26(1), 36-42.

15.

O’Donnell, L. N. , Duran, R. H. , San Doval, A. , Breslin, M. J. , Juhn, G. M. , & Stueve, A. (1997). Obtaining written parent permission for school-based health surveys of urban young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 376-383.

16.

P. L. No. 103-227, 20 U.S.C.A. § 1232h (1994).

17.

Renger, R. , Gotkin, V. , Crago, M. , & Shisslak, C. (1998). Family Privacy Protection Act for research and evaluation involving minors. The American Journal of Evaluation, 19(2), 191-202.

18.

Rossi, P. , Freeman, H. , & Lipsey, M. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

19.

Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative research. New York: Russell Sage.

20.

Severson, H. , & Ary, D. (1983). Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescents.Addictive Behaviors, 8, 433-437.

21.

Severson, H. , & Biglan, A. (1989). Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: Politics, policy and pragmatics. Preventive Medicine, 18, 267-279.

22.

Sussman, S. , Dent, C. W. , Stacy, A. W. , Burciaga, C. , Raynor, A. , Turner, G. E. , Ventura, C. , Craig, S. , Hansen, W. B. , Burton, D. , & Flay, B. R. (1990). Peer-group association and adolescent tobacco use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(4), 349-352.

23.

Thompson, T. L , (1984). A comparison of methods of increasing parental consent rates in social research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 779-787.

24.

Yeager, J. D. (1994). Confidentiality of student records: A guide for school districts establishing policies and procedures with special emphasis on alcohol and other drug use. Portland, OR: Western Regional Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.