Advantages and Challenges of Using Inclusive Evaluation Approaches in Evaluation Practice

American Heritage Dictionary, (1985). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Bleier, R. (Ed)., (1986). Feminist approaches to science. NY: Pergamon Press.

Coghlan, A. (1995, November). Incorporating participatory evaluation to empower Ugandan communities to fight AIDS. Paper presented at the International Evaluation Conference, Vancouver, British Colombia.

Emihovich, C. & Blake, B. H. (1992, April). Evaluators as moral agents: risks and responsibilities in a new role. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Ericson, D. (1990). Social justice, evaluation, and the educational system. In K. Sirotnik (Ed.), Evaluation and social justice: Issues in public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

Fetterman, D. M. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, Evaluation Practice, 15, 1-16.

Fine, M. (1994). Dis-stance and other stances: Negotiations of power inside feminist research. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method, (pp. 13-35). NY: Routledge.

Fine, M. (Ed.), (n.d.). Disruptive voices, (pp. 205-232). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Foster, S. (1993, August). Ethnographic interviews in disability studies: The case of research with people who are deaf. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Miami, FL.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Greene, J. C. (1991, April). Responding to evaluation’s moral challenge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Greene, J. C. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation: Practice and promise. In Dentin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 530-544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Greene, J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 25-36.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). Effective evaluation (2nd edition). Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). Fourth generation evaluation: An ‘interview’ with Egon Guba and Yvonna Lincoln. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 2(3), 3-14.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Dentin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies, (pp. 49-82). NY: Routledge.

House, Ernest (1993). Professional evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kaminsky, A. L. (1993). Participatory evaluation in hierarchies: Practical dilemmas of implementation. Masters thesis, Department of Human Service Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Kaminsky, A. L. (1997). Individual-community tensions in collaborative inquiry: Voice, action, and empowerment in context. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Service Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Kent, J. (1996). Group inquiry: A democratic dialogue? Paper presented at the Fourth International Social Science Methodology Conference, University of Essex, Colchester, England.

Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory into practice, 31(2), 1-13.

Lincoln, Y. S. (1991). The arts and sciences of program evaluation: A moral tale for practitioners. Evaluation Practice, 12(1), 1-7.

Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Tracks toward a postmodern politics of evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 299-309.

Lincoln, Y. S. (1995, April). Standards for qualitative research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1992). In response to Lee Se&rest’s 1991 AEA Presidential Address: Roots: Back to our first generations, Evaluation Practice, 13(3), 165-170.

Lincoln, Y. S. & Levin, Morten (in progress). Evaluation for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, under contract.

Madison, A. M. (1992). Primary inclusion of culturally diverse minority program participants in the evaluation process. In Madison, A. M. (Ed.), Minority issues in program evaluation, (pp. 35-44). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

Mathie, A. (1996). An evaluation system for CUSO: Promoting dialogue across epistemological divides in a learning organization. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Service Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Mathie, A. & Greene, J. C. (1997). Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity? Evaluation and Program Planning, 20, 279-285.

Mertens, D. M. (1995). Identifying and respecting differences among participants in evaluation studies. In Shadish, W. L. , Newmann, D. L. , Scheirer, M. A. & Wye, C. (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions in Program Evaluation, 66, 91-98. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Mertens, D. M. (1996a). Needs assessment: Crucial step in emancipatory work. Paper presented at the Fourth International Social Science Methodology Conference. University of Essex, Colchester, England.

Mertens, D. M. (1996b). Breaking the silence about sexual abuse of deaf youth. American Annals of the Deaf, 141(5), 352-358.

Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mertens, D. M. , Farley, J. , Madison, A. , & Singleton, P. (1994). Diverse voices in evaluation practice: Feminists, minorities, and persons with disabilities. Evaluation Practice, 15(2), 123-129.

Mertens, D. M. & McLaughlin, J. (1995). Research methods in special education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Morgan, G. & Ramirez, R. (1984). Action learning: A holographic metaphor for guiding social change. Human Relations, 37(1), 1-28.

Noddings, N. (1994, April). Feminism and philosophy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap, & Society, 7(2), 101-114.

Patton, M. Q. (1996). Utilization-oriented evaluation, new century edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Pursely, L. A. (1996). Empowerment and utilization through participatory evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Service Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. NY: Oxford University Press.

Richardson, V. (1990). At-risk programs: Evaluation and critical inquiry. In Sirotnik, K. (Ed.), Evaluation and social justice: Issues in public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Ryan, K. E. , Knell, S. , & Geissler, B. (1996). Progress and accountability in family literacy: Lessons from a collaborative approach, Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 3.

Schwandt, T. A. (1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation, Educational Researcher, 18(8), 11-16, 35.

Striven, M. S. (1983). Evaluation ideologies. In Madaus, G. F. , Striven, M. S. , and Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds). Evaluation models, (pp. 229-260). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Shadish, W. R. , Cook, T. D. , & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Sirotnik, K. A. , (Ed). (1990). Evaluation and social justice: Issues in public education. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sirotnik, K. A. , & Oakes, J. (1990). Evaluation as critical inquiry: School improvement as a case in point. In K. Sirotnik (Ed.), Evaluation and social justice: Issues in public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Publishers.

Stanfield, J. H. & Dennis, R. (1993). (Eds.) Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 3-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

VanderPlaat, M. (1995). Beyond technique: Issues in evaluating for empowerment. Evaluation, 1, 81-96.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. NY: Wiley and Sons.

Weiner, G. (1990). Ethical practice in an unjust world: educational evaluation and social justice, Gender and Education, 2, 231-238.

Weiss, C. H. (1973). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation, 1, 37-45.

Weiss, C. H. (1978). Improving linkage between social research and public policy. In Lynn, L. E. (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection, (pp. 23-81). Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.

Weiss, C. H. (1983a). The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origins and promise. In Byrk, A. S. (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation, (pp. 3-14).

Weiss, C. H. (1983b). Toward the future of stakeholder approaches in evaluation. In Byrk, A. S. (Ed.), Stakeholder-based evaluation, (pp. 83-96).

Weiss, C. H. & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980). Social science research and decision-making. NY: Columbia University Press.

Weiss, C. H. & Greene, J. C. (1992). An evaluation partnership for family support and education programs and evaluations. Family Science Review, 5, 131-149.

Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The artand craft of policy analysis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.