Bamberger, M. (1991). The politics of evaluation in developing countriesEvaluation and Program Planning, 14, 325-339.
2.
Binnendijk, A.L. (1989). Donor agency experience with the monitoring and evaluation of developing projectsEvaluation Review , 13(3), 206-223.
3.
Cook, T.D., Levinson-Rose, J., & Pollard, W.E. (1980). The mis-utilization of evaluation research: Some pitfalls of definitionsKnowledge, 1(June), 477-498.
4.
Cracknell, B. (1988). Evaluating development assistance: A review of the literaturePublic Administration and Development , 8, 75-83.
5.
Goldenberg, E.N. (1983). The three faces of evaluationJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(4), 515-525.
6.
Grizzle, G. (1981). Manager's guide to the meaning and uses of performance measurementAmerican Review of Public Administration , 15(1), 16-26.
7.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1987). The countenances of fourth generation evaluation: Description, judgment and negotiation In D. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics ofprogram evaluation(pp. 202-234). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Hageboeck, M., & Snyder, M. (1991). Coverage and quality of U.S.A.I.D. evaluations in FY 1989 and FY 1990Washington, D.C.: Management Systems International.
9.
Kjekshus, H. (1991). Evaluation policy and performance: The state of the art In O. Stokke (Ed.), Evaluating development assistance: Policies and performance.London: Frank Cass.
10.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1991). Evaluation in AfricaParis : Author.
11.
_____. ( 1988). Evaluation in developing countries. A step in a dialogueParis: Author.
12.
Patton, M.Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluationBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Patton, M.Q. (1982). Practical evaluationBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Raizen, S.A., & Rossi, P.H. (1981). Program evaluation in educationWashington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
Stokke, O. (Ed.) (1991). Evaluating development assistance: Policies and performanceLondon: Frank Cass.
16.
Thompson, R.J. (1989). Evaluator as power broker In M. Hendricks and & R.F. Conner (Eds.), International innovations in evaluation methodology.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Uphoff, N. (1992). Monitoring and evaluating popular participation in world bank-assisted projects In B. Bhatnagar & A. C. Williams (Eds.), Participatory development and the World Bank: Potential directions for change(pp. 135-153). World Bank Discussion Paper 183. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
18.
U.S. Agency for International Development. ( 1990). The U.S.A.I.D. evaluation system: Past performance and future directionsWashington, D.C.: Bureau for Program and Policy Coordination, Agency for International Development.
19.
U.S. Agency for International Development. ( 1989). U.S.A.I.D. evaluation Handbook. In U.S.A.I.D. program design and evaluation methodology reportWashington, D.C. : Agency for International Development.
20.
Van Sant, J. (1989). Qualitative analysis in development evaluationsEvaluation Review, 13(3) 257-272.
Weiss, C.H. (1988). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care?Evaluation Practice, 9(3), 5-19.
23.
Werge, R., & Haag, R.A. (1989). Three techniques for helping international program managers use evaluation findings In J.B. Barkdoll & G.L. Bell (Eds.), Evaluation and the federal decision maker (pp. 35-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Yin, R.K., Weiss, C.H., Cheung, O. & Capper, J. (1988). Preliminary study of the utilization of U.S.A.I.D.'s evaluation reportsWashington, DC: Research and Consulting Division, Information Systems Division, Cosmos Corporation.