Berk, R.A., & Newton, P.J. (1985). Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis Police ExperimentAmerican Sociological Review, 50(April), 253-262.
2.
Bickman, L. (1990). Advances in program theorySan Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Browne, A., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Should evaluation become implementation? In A. J. Love, (Ed.), Developing effective internal evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Capper, C.A., & Jamison, M.T. (1993). Let the buyer beware: Total quality management and educational research and practiceEducational Researcher , 22, 25-30.
Leonard, E.C. Jr. & Miller, M.J. (1992). The role of evaluation in increasing the usefulness of employee involvement programsEvaluation Practice , 13(1), 9-13.
12.
Lipps, G. & Grant, P.R. (1990). A participatory method of assessing program implementationEvaluation Review, 14(4), 427-434.
13.
Love, A.J. (1983). The organizational context and the development of internal evaluation In A. J. Love (Ed.), Developing effectiveness internal evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Mathews, J. (1993). Total quality management [No. 183, 6/6/93, H1]Washington Post.
15.
Rutman, L. (1980). Planning useful evaluations: Evaluability assessmentBeverly Hills: Sage.
16.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4thed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Smith, M.F. (1989). Evaluability assessment: A practical approachBoston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18.
Shoop, T. (1993). Headlong into qualityGovernment Executive, 25(3), 19-23.
19.
Wholey, J.S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: Developing program theory In L. Bickman (Ed.), Using program theory in evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Wholey, J.S. (1989). Introduction: How evaluation can improve agency and program performance In J. S. Wholey, K. E. Newcomber and Associates (Eds.), Improvinggovernment performance.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.