Articles should deal with topics applicable to the broad field of evaluation. Implications for practicing evaluators should be clearly identified. Examples of contributions include, but are not limited to, reviews of new developments in evaluation, and descriptions of current evaluation efforts, research problems, or techniques. Manuscripts should include appropriate references and not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borich, G.D., & Madden, S. (1977). Evaluating classroom instruction: A sourcebook of instruments. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
Brandt, R. (May, 1989). On teacher empowerment: A conversation with Ann Lieberman. Educational Leadership, 46(8), 23-26.
3.
Cook T.D., & Campbell D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
4.
Cronbach, L.J., & Snow, R.E. (1981). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
5.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 59-80.
6.
Esposito, D. (1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: Principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing moreeffective educational environments. Review of Educational Research, 43(2), 163-179.
7.
Fullan, M. & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation . Review of Educational Research, 43(2), 335-397.
8.
Garwick, C. (1979). Interpreting the goal attainment score. Minneapolis: Program Evaluation Resource Center.
9.
Glass, G.V. & Ellwein, M.C. (1986, December). Reform by raising test standards. Evaluation Comment, CRESST, CA: Los Angeles , 1-6. Kiresuk, T.J. & Sherman, R.E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4(6), 443-453.
10.
Lam, T.C.M. (1990, October). A two-stage approach to assessing program effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Chicago, IL.
11.
Maher, C.A. (1983). Goal attainment scaling: A method for evaluating special services. Exceptional Children, 49(6), 529-536.
12.
Maeroff, G.I. (1988). A blueprint for empowering teachers. Phi Delta Kappan,69(7), 473-477.
13.
National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The national education goals report: Executive summary. Washington D.C.Author.
14.
Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1972/1977). "Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programs." Reprinted in D. Hamilton et. al., Beyond the numbers game: A reader in educational evaluation. London: Macmillan.
15.
Patton, M. (1978). Evaluation of program implementation. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Utilization-focused evaluation (pp. 318-346). Sage Publication, Beverly Hills: CA.
16.
Resnick D.P. & Resnick L.B. (1985, April). Standards, curriculum, and performance: A historical and comparartive perspective. Educational Researcher , 14(4), 5-20.
17.
Sartorius, R.H. (1991). The logical framework approach to project design and management. Evaluation Practice, 12(2), 139-147.
18.
Sechrest, L. ; West, S.; Phillips, M.A.; Redner, R.; Yeaton, W. (1979). Some neglected problems in evaluation research: Strength and integrity of treatments. Evaluation Studies Review Annual (pp. 15-35). Sage Publication, Beverly Hills: CA.
19.
Scriven M. (1972, December). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation . Evaluation Comment, 3(4), 1-4.
20.
Simon, L. M. & Boyer, E. G. (Ed.) (1970). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
21.
Spady W.G. (1988, October). Organizing for results: The basis for authentic restructuring and reform. Educational Leadership , 45(1), 4-8.
22.
Stake, R.E. (1967). The countenance of education evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523-40.
23.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1970, March). The use of experimental design in educational evaluation. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota .
24.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca: IL: F. E. Peacock.
25.
Talmage, H. (Eds.) (1975). System of individualized education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
26.
Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,70(9), 703-713.
28.
Wilson, M. (1992). Educational leverage from a political necessity: Implications of new perspectives on student assessment for Chapter 1 evaluation . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(2), 123-144.
