Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1971). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
2.
Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. Oxford: Pergamon.
3.
Bleier, R. (Ed.). (1986). Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon.
4.
Clandinin, D.J., & Connelly, F.M. (1993). Personal experience methods . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 413-426). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G., (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6.
Emmet, T.S., & Wagner, L. (1992). Evaluator activism: Maximizing utility without compromising integrity in conducting program evaluations. Unpublished paper.
7.
Fetterman, D.M. (1992). In response to Lee Sechrest's AEA Presidential address: Roots: Back to our first generation. Evaluation Practice , 13(3), 171-2.
8.
Ford, J. (1975). Paradigms and fairy tales: Vol. 1 & 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge .
Harding, J. (Ed.). (1986). Perspectives on gender and science. London: Falmer.
12.
Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
13.
Harding, S., & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality: feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
14.
Keller, E.F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Lincoln, Y.S. (1991). The arts and sciences of program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12(1), 1-7.
16.
Lincoln, Y.A. (1993). I and thou: Method, voice and roles in research with the silenced. In D. McLaughlin & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Naming silenced lives (pp. 29-47). New York: Routledge .
17.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1992). In response to Lee Sechrest's 1991 AEA presidential address: Roots: Back to our first generations. Evaluation Practice, 13(3), 165-70.
19.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1994). RSVP: We are pleased to accept your invitation . Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 179-192.
20.
Marcus, G.E., & Fischer, M.J.M. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. London: Wildwood House .
22.
Nielsen, J. M. (Ed.). (1990). Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
23.
Reason, P. (Ed.). (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage.
24.
Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (Eds.). (1981). Human inquiry: A sourcebook . New York: John Wiley and Sons .
25.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Richardson, L. (1993). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis . Boston: Beacon.
28.
Sechrest, L. (1992). Roots: Back to our first generations. Evaluation Practice, 13(1), 1-8.
29.
Sechrest, L., Babcock, J., & Smith, S. (1993). An invitation to methodological pluralism. Evaluation Practice, 14(3), 227-235.
30.
Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
31.
Stanfield, John H., Jr. (1993). Ethnic modeling in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)., Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 175-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
32.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.