Campbell, D.T. (1986). Relabeling internal and external validity for applied social scientists. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis. New Directions in ProgramEvaluation, 31, 67-77.
2.
Chen, H. and Rossi, P.H. (1981). The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation . In H. E. Freeman and M. A. Solomon (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual: (Vol. 6, pp. 38-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Conner, S. (1989). Postmodernist culture. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
4.
Cook, T.D. (1983). Quasi-experimentation: Its ontology, epistemology, and methodology. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond methods (pp. 74-94).
5.
Cook, T.D. (1991). Clarifying the warrant for generalized causal inferences in quasi-experimentation. In M. McLaughlin and D. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education at quarter century (pp. 115-144). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Cook, T.D. (1993). A quasi-sampling theory of the generalization of causal relationships. In L. B. Sechrest & A. G. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 57 (Spring), 39-82.
7.
Cordray, D.S. (1986). Quasi-experimental analysis: A mixture of methods and judgment. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis. New Directions in ProgramEvaluation, 31, 9-27.
8.
Cronbach, L.J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
9.
Glass, G.V. (1982). Experimental validity. In H. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research. (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 631-637). New York: Free Press.
10.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly.Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
11.
Gore, A. (1993). Creating a government that works better and costs less: The report of the National Performance Review. New York, NY: Plume.
12.
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. (1989). Towards a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 11, 3, 255-274.
13.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of post modernity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
14.
House, E.R. (1978). The logic of evaluative argument. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.
15.
House, E.R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1985). Assessing local causality in qualitative research . In D. N. Berg & K. K. Smith (Eds.), The self in social inquiry (pp. 351-381). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Light, R.J., & Pillemer, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
18.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?Educational Researcher , 17, 2, 13-17.
19.
Reichardt, C.S., & Cook, T.D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods . In Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Reichardt, C.S., & Rallis, S.E. (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. New Directions in Program Evaluation, 61. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Ross, D. (1991). The origins of American social science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Scriven, M. (1980). The logic of evaluation. Pt. Reyes, CA: Edgepress.
23.
Scriven, M. (1983). Evaluation ideologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.). Evaluation models (pp. 229-260). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
24.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications .
25.
Shadish, W.R. Jr., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Houts, A.C. (1986). Quasi-experimentation in a critical multipilist mode. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis. New Directions in ProgramEvaluation, 31, 29-46.
27.
Shotland, R.L., & Mark, M.M. (1986). Improving inferences from multiple methods. In M. M. Mark & R. L. Shotland (Eds.). Multiple methods in program evaluation . New Directions for Program Evaluation, 35, 77-94.
28.
Smith, M.L. (1986). The whole is greater: Combining qualitative and quantitative evaluation approaches in evaluation studies. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation . New Directions for Program Evaluation, 30, 37-54.
29.
Stake, R.E. (1983). The case study method in social inquiry. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 279-286). Boston, MA : Kluwer-Nijhoff.
30.
Suchman, E.A. (1967). Evaluative research. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
Trochim, W.M.K. (1986). Editor's notes. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis. New Directions in Program Evaluation, 31, 1-7.
