Current Trends and Future Directions in Program Evaluation

Achen, C.H. (1986). The statisitcal analysis of quasi-experiments . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bickman, L. (Ed.). (1987). Using program theory in evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bickman, L. (Ed.). (1990). Advances in program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brunner, I. , & Guzman, A. (1989). Participatory evaluation: A tool to assess projects and empower people. In R.F. Conner & M. Hendricks (Eds.), International innovations in evaluation methodology (pp. 9-18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury, CA: Sage.

Chen, H.T. , & Rossi, P.H. (1992). Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations . Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Chen, H.T. (1994a). Theory-driven evaluations: Needs, difficulties, and options. Evaluaiton Practice, 15(1), 79-82.

Chen H. T. (1994b). A normative evaluation of a juvenile delinquency program in Tawian. Unpublished Manuscript.

Cook, T.D. , Cooper, H. , Cordray, D.S. , Hartmann, H. , Hedges, L.L. , Light, R.J. , Louis, T.A. , & Mosteller, I. (1992). Meta-analysis for explanation: A case book. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cook, T.D. , & Reichardt, C.S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Newbury, CA: Sage.

Green, J. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation: Practice and promise . In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln , (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 530-544). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba, E.G. , & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth-generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

House, E.R. (1990). Methodology and justice. In K. A. Sirotnik (Ed.), Evaluation and social justice (pp. 23-36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Univesity of Chicago Press.

Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Reichardt, C.S. , & Rallis, S.F. (1994). The qualitative and quantitative debate: New perspective . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .

Rossi, P.H. , & Freeman, H.E. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Scriven, M. (1994). The fine line between evaluation and explanation . Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 75-77.

Scriven, M. (1971). Objectivity and subjectivity in educational research . In G. F. Madaus , M. Scriven , & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Philosophical redirection of educational research. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Shadish, W.R. , Cook, T.D. , & Leviton, L.C. (1991). Foundations ofprogram evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Smith, N.L. (1994). Claryfying and expanding the application of program theory-driven evaluations. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 83-87.

Sirotnik, K. A. (Ed.). (1990). Evaluation and social justice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wortman, P.M. (1983). Evaluation reserch: A methodological perspective . Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 223-260.