From time to time, articles are published in EP that evoke comments from readers.In Responseis reserved for this dialogue. Contributions should be to the point, concise, and easy for readers to track to targeted articles. Comments may be positive or negative, but if the latter, then at least relatively nice! Please keep length of comments to minimum essential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cronbach, L., & Suppes, P. (1969). Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry in education. New York: Macmillan .
2.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (1993). The handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
3.
Firestone, W.E. (1990). Accommodations toward a paradigm-praxis dialectic . In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Gould, S.J. (1989). Wonderful life: The Burgess shale and the nature of history. New York: Norton.
5.
Guba, E. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. In CSE monograph series in evaluation . Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles Press.
6.
Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 29, 75-92.
7.
Guba, E. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Guba, E. (1992). Relativism. Curriculum Inquiry , 22, 17-24.
9.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Sage.
10.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Hawking, S. (1993). Black holes and baby universes. New York: Bantam.
13.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
14.
Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking. New York: Hyperion.
15.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Lincoln, Y. (1991). The arts and sciences of program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12(1), 1-8.
17.
Lincoln, Y. (1993). I and thou: Method, voice, and roles. In D. McLaughlin & W. Tierney (Eds.), Naming silenced lives. New York: Routledge.
18.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1992). In response to Lee Sechrest's 1991 AEA presidential address. Evaluation Practice, 13(3), 165-170.
19.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
McCann, H. (1978). Chemistry transformed: The paradigmatic shift from phlogiston to oxygen. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21.
McNeill, D., & Freiberger, P. (1993). Fuzzy logic. New York: Simon & Shuster.
22.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative date analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
23.
Namenwirth, M. (1986). Science seen through a feminist prism. In R. Bleir (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon.
24.
Patton, M. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Phillips, D. (1990). Postpositivistic science: Myths and realities . In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Sanjek, R. (Ed.). (1990). Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Sechrest, L., Babcock, J., & Smith, S. (1993). An invitation to methodological pluralism. Evaluation Practice, 14(3), 227-235.
28.
Sechrest, L. (1992). Roots: Back to our first generations. Evaluation Practice, 13(1), 1-8.
29.
Skrtic, T. (1990). Social accommodation: Toward a dialogical discourse in educational inquiry. In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures. Chicago, IL: Rand, McNally.
32.
Wolf, F. (1981). Taking the quantum leap. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
