Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP.Forum articles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles motivated by previousForumpresentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled "Comments on ... " and "Rejoinder to ... " will not be pubished inForum —such responses are welcome and encouraged in theIn Responsesection of EP. Standard citations and reference lists should acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, L. (1992). Evaluating decision support and expert systems . New York: Wiley.
2.
Kramer, H.C. (1992). Evaluating medical tests. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Scriven, M. (1991). Key evaluation checklist. Evaluation Thesaurus, 4eBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Scriven, M. (1993). Hard won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions in Program Evaluation (Summer): Jossey-Bass.
5.
University MicroNews. (1989). No title given (Vol. 16). University of Western Australia.
6.
Scriven, M. (1983). Word magic: Evaluating and selecting word processing . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth: van Nostrand .
