TRACES are what evaluators left behind—discoveries, records, tracks—which made marks on the profession of program evaluation. Published here are excerpts from our past (e.g., articles, passages from books, speeches) that show where we have been or affected where we are g(r)o(w)ing. Suggestions for inclusion should be sent to the Editor, along with rationale for their import. Photocopies of the original printed versions are preferred with full bibliographic information. Copying rights will be secured by the Editor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Campbell, D.T. and Erlebacher, A. (1970). How regression artifacts in quasi-experimental evaluations can mistakenly make compensatory education look harmful. In: J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Compensatory Education: A National Debate, Vol. 3, New York: Brunner/Mazel.
2.
Caplan, N. and Nelson, S. (1973). On being useful: The nature and consequences of psychological research on social problems. American Psychologist , 28:(3),199-211.
Hatry, H.P., Winnie, R.E. and Fisk, D.M. (1973). Practical program evaluation for state and local government officials. Washington: The Urban Institute.
5.
Lindblom, C.E. (1968). The policy-making process. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
6.
Lynn, L.E. Jr. (1973). A federal evaluation office?Evaluation1(2), 56-59, 92, 96.
7.
Margolis, J. (1971). Evaluation criteria in social policy. In: T.R. Dye (Ed.), The Measurement of Policy Impact. Tallahassee: Florida State University, 25-31.
8.
Moynihan, D.P. (1970) Policy vs. program in the 70's. The Public Interest. (No. 20,1970 ), 90-100.
9.
Mushkin, S.J. (1973). Evaluations: Use with caution. Evaluation (1)2, 30-35.
10.
Orlans, H. (1973). Contracting for knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Rossi, P. (1969). Practice, method, and theory in evaluating social-acting programs. In: J.L. Sundquist (Ed.), On Fighting Poverty: Perspectives from Experience. New York: Basic Books, 217-34.
12.
Schick, A. (1971) From Analysis to Evaluation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Vol. 394) 57-71.
13.
Schulberg, H.C. and Baker, F. (1968) Program Evaluation Models and the Implementation of Research Findings. American Journal of Public Health (58:7) 1248-55.
14.
Schultze, C.L. (1968) The politics and economics ofpublic spending. Washington: Brookings Institution.
15.
Stanley, D.T., Nann, D.E., and Doig, J.W. (1967) Men who govern: A biographical profile of federal political executives. Washington, Brookings Institution.
16.
Ward, D.A. and Kassebaum, G.G. (1972). On biting the hand that feeds: Some implications of sociological evaluations of correctional effectiveness. In: C. Weiss (Ed.), Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 300-10.
17.
Warren, R. (1973). The social context of program evaluation research . Paper presented at Ohio State University Symposium on Evaluation in Human Service Programs, June.
18.
Weiss, C.H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Weiss, C.H. (1970). The politicization of evaluation research. Journal of Social Issues26(4), 57-58.
20.
Weiss, C.H. (1973). The Politics of Impact Measurement. Policy Studies Journal, 1(3), 179-83.
