Alkin, M. (1990). Debates on evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. In: L. Bickman, Ed., Using program theory in evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation #33, San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 5-18.
3.
Como, L. & Snow, R. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In: M. Wittrock, Ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd Edition, New York: MacMillan, 605-629.
4.
Cousins, J. & Leithwood, K. (1986). Current empirical research on evaluation utilization . Review of Educational Research, 56 (3), 331-365.
5.
Cronbach, L. & Associates, ( 1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Eden, C., Jones, S., & Sims, D. (1983). Messing about in problems: An informal structured approach to their identification and management. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
7.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (4), 569-582.
8.
Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Education Resources.
9.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of methods . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd Edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Posavac, E., & Carey, R. (1989). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. 3rd Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
Regan, E., & Ross, J. (1991). Professional development activitiesfor the reflective consultant: Techniques for learning how to help schools. Toronto: OISE Press.
13.
Regan, E., & Ross, J. (1992). Professional development for consultants: An evaluation . Alberta Journal of Educational Research38 (3), 189-204.
14.
Regan, E., & Winter, C. (1978). Perspectives on consulting practice; consultant and superintendent views. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, London, Ontario .
15.
Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Longman.
16.
Ross, J., & Regan, E. (1990). Self-reported strategies of experienced and inexperienced consultants: Exploring differences. Alberta Journal of Educational Research36 (2), 157-180.
17.
Ross, J., and Regan, E. (1991). Antecedent conditions affecting learning in an in-service program for consultants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
18.
Ross, J., & Regan, E. (in press). Sharing professional experience: Its impact on professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education8 (4).
19.
Shadish, W., Cook, T., and Leviton, L. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
20.
Smylie, M. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change . American Educational Research Journal, 25 (1), 1-30.
21.
Stein, M. & Wang, M. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education4 (2), 171-187.
22.
Wholey, J. (1987). Evaluability assessment: Developing program theory . In: L. Bickman, (Ed.), Using program theory in evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation #33, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 77-92.
23.
Worthen, B. (1990). Program evaluation. In: H. Walberg & G. Haertel, (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation. Toronto: Pergammon Press, 42-47.
