Articles should deal with topics applicable to the broadfield ofprogram evaluation. Implications for practicing evaluators should be clearly identified. Examples of contributions include but are not limited to reviews of new developments in evalu ation and descriptions of a current evaluation effort, research problem, or technique. Manuscripts should include appropriate references and not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Copi, I.M. (1978). Introduction to logic. 5th ed., pp. 461; 465-466, and 486-489. New York: Macmillan.
2.
Garrison, J.W. (1986). Some principles of postpositivistic philosophy of science. Educational Researcher, 15, 12-18 (November).
3.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
4.
Goodwin, J.S. and J.M. Goodwin. (1984). The tomato effect. Journal of the American Medical Association, 251, 2387-2390.
5.
McClosky, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248, 3122-3130.
6.
Phillips, D.C. (1985). On what scientists know, and how they know it . In: E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing. National Society for Study of Ed.
7.
Physical Science Study Committee. (1960). Physics. Boston: D. C. Heath .
8.
Reichardt, C.S. and H.F. Gollob. (1987). Taking uncertainty into account when estimating effects. In M.M. Mark and R.L. (Eds.), Shotland in Multiple Methods for Program Evaluation, pp. 7-22. New Directions for Program Evaluation , No. 35. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Stake, R.E. (1986). Quieting reform: Social science and social action in an urban youth program. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
