The Politics of Verifying Trustworthiness in Evaluation Auditing

Abstract

Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP. Forum articles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles motivated by previous Forum presentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled "Comments on... " and "Rejoinder to... " will not be published in Forum — such responses, and those not of article length or nature, are welcome and encouraged in the Letters section of EP. Standard citations and reference lists will acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernstein, R.J. (1976). The restructuring ofsocial and political theory . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Cook, T.D. , & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Eisner, E. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 15-20.

Evaluation Research Society Standards Committee. (1982). Evaluation Research Society standards for program evaluation. In P. Rossi (Ed.), Standards for evaluation practice. New Directions for Program Evaluation No. 15. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Goetz, J.P. , & Le Compte, M.D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.

Guba, E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75-91.

Guba, E.G. , & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. (Trans. J. J. Shapiro). Boston: Beacon.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation No. 30. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Maclntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

13.

Schwandt, T.A. , & Halpern, E.S. (1988). Linking auditing and metaevaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

14.

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1974). Meta-evaluation. Occasional Paper Series No. 3 . Kalamazoo Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University .

15.

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1981). Metaevaluation: Concepts, standards, and uses . In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Educational evaluation methodology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

16.

Sullivan, W.M. (1986). Reconstructing public philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

17.

U. S. Comptroller General. (1988). Government auditing standards (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC : U. S. General Accounting Office.