Abstract
Letters are selected for their pertinence to material published in Evaluation Practice or because they discuss issues/problems of general interest to practicing evaluators. Letters pertaining to material published in EP may criticize articles or reports; correct errors; provide support or agreement; or offer different points of view, clarifications, or additional information. Depending on the nature of the discussion, authors of articles in question may be given an opportunity to reply in the same issue. Preference will be given to letters that do not exceed 500 words. Those accepted for publication may be edited and shortened.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.