Boruch, R.F., Cordray, D.S., et al. (1983). Recommendations to Congress and their rationale: The Holtzman project. Evaluation Review, 1983 , 7, 5-35.
2.
Boruch, R.F., & Wortman, P.M. (1979). Implications of educational evaluation for evaluation policy. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education. Washington, DC : AERA.,
3.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on training. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago : Rand McNally.
4.
Chelimsky, E. (1981). Designing backward from the end-use. Paper presented to the Evaluation Research Society Annual Meeting , October.
5.
Cronbach, L.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology . American Psychologist, 30116-127.
6.
Cronbach, L.J. (1977). Remarks to the New Society. Evaluation Research SocietyNewsletter, 1, 1-3.
7.
Cronbach, L.J. & associates ( 1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
8.
Datta, L.-E. (1976). The impact of the Westinghouse/ Ohio evaluation on the development of Project Head Start: An examination of the immediate and longer-term effects and how they came about. In C. C. Abt (Ed.), The evaluation ofsocialprograms. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Gilbert, J.P., McPeek, B., & Mosteller, F. (1977). Progress in surgery and anesthesia: Benefits and risks of innovative therapy. In J. P. Bunker , B. A. Barnes, and F. Mosteller (Eds.), Costs, risks and benefits of surgery. New York: Oxford (1980). University Press.
House, E.R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Kantrowitz, A. et al. (1976). The science court experiment: An interim report. Science, 193, 653-656.
13.
Kolata, G. (1982). Heart study produces a surprise result. Science, 218, 31-32.
14.
Lazar, I., Hubbell, V.R., Murray, H., Rosche, M., and Royce, J. (1977). The persistence of preschool effects: A long-term follow-up of fourteen infant and preschool experiments. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
Mosteller, F. (1981). Innovation and evaluation. Science , 211, 881-886,
16.
Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group (1982). Multiple Risk Factor intervention trial: Risk factor changes and mortality results. JAMA.248, 1465-1477.
17.
Nicholson, R.A. & Berman, J.S. (1983). Is follow-up necessary in evaluating psychotherapy . Psychological Bulletin,93, 261-278.
18.
Patton, M.Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Riecken, H.W., Boruch, R.F., & associates ( 1974). Social experimentation: A methodfor planning and evaluating social intervention. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1979). The ecology of program research and evaluation: A model of evaluation succession. In L. Sechrest and associates (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (vol. 4). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Weiss, C.H. (1977). Introduction. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath .
22.
Wortman, P.M., & Bryant, F.B. (in press). School desegregation and black achievement: An integrative review. Sociological Methods and Research.
23.
Wortman, P.M., Vinokur, A., Sechrest, L., & associates( 1982). Evaluation of the NIH consensus Development Process-Phase 1: Final Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
24.
Wortman, P.M. & Yeaton, W.H. (1983). Synthesis of results in controlled trials of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In R. J. Light (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 8). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.