This article problematizes methodological practices, specifically the use of surveys as tools of measurement in evaluation with migrant youth. Drawing from Foucault’s Genealogy of Ethics, we investigate the knowledge created about particular minoritized groups through the author’s current evaluation, the power relations involved, and the ethical dimensions of evaluation. We argue that ethical questions for evaluators are entangled in an era of neoliberal, audit culture in educational research. We offer a theoretical orientation for productive critique of methodological practice.
BajajM.BartlettL. (2017). Critical transnational curriculum for immigrant and refugee students. Curriculum Inquiry, 47, 25–35.
2.
BajajM.SureshS. (2018). The “warm embrace” of a newcomer school for immigrant & refugee youth. Theory Into Practice, 57(2), 91–98.
3.
BartlettL.GarícaO. (2011). Additive schooling in subtractive times: Bilingual education and Dominican immigrant youth in the heights. Vanderbilt University Press.
4.
Cheney-LippoldJ. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420
5.
ChouinardJ. A.MilleyP. (2015). From new public management to new political governance: Implications for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.1
6.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
7.
CucchiaraM. B. (2013). Marketing schools, marketing cities: Who wins and who loses when schools become urban amenities. University of Chicago Press.
FoucaultM. (1978). The History of Sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Random House, Inc.
11.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
12.
FoucaultM. (1994). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In RabinowP. (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 253–280). New York Press.
13.
FoucaultM. (2003). Governmentality. In RabinowP. (Ed.), The essential Foucault (pp. 229–245). The New Press.
14.
GoodmanA. (2015). Nation of migrants, historians of migration. Journal of American Ethnic History, 34(4), 7–16.
HackingI. (1999). The social construction of what?Harvard University Press.
17.
HarveyD. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
18.
HoodS.HopsonR. K.KirkhartK. E. (2015). Culturally responsive evaluation. In WholeyJ. S.HatryH. P.NewcomerK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed., pp. 281–317). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch12
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (2013). Educational delusions?University of California Press.
27.
PorterT. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
28.
PradoJ. (2011). “Honor the context”: Opening lines for a critical multicultural evaluative practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(3), 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010397531
29.
RodriguezS. (2015). The dangers of compassion: The cultural positioning of refugee students in policy and education research and the impact on teacher education. Knowledge Cultures, 3(2), 112–126.
30.
RodriguezS. (2019). “We’re building the community; it’s a hub for democracy”: Lessons learned from a library-based program for newcomer immigrant and refugee youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 135–144.
31.
RodriguezS.AcreeJ. (2020). Biopolitical power in evaluation research with transnational migrant youth. Evaluation, 26(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020914314
32.
RodriguezS.MonrealT. (2017). “This state is racist”: Policy problematization and undocumented youth experiences in the New Latino South. Educational Policy, 31(6), 764–800.
33.
RoseN. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). Free Association Books.
34.
RoseN.MillerP. (2013). Governing the present. Polity Press.
35.
SellarS.ThompsonG. (2016). The becoming-statistic: Information ontologies and computerized adaptive testing in education. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(5), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616655770
36.
SenguptaS.HopsonR.Thompson-RobinsonM. (2004). Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview. New Directions for Evaluation, 2004(102), 5–19.
37.
Waapalaneexkweew & Dodge-FrancisC. (2018). Culturally responsive indigenous evaluation and tribal governments: Understanding the relationship. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20329
38.
WebbP. T. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27, 364–376.
