Research and Evaluation With Community-Based Projects: Approaches,Considerations,and Strategies

Abstract

Researcher–community partnerships are a necessary but not sufficient facet of effective research and evaluation with community-based projects and in clinical settings. This article describes two approaches that we have integrated into a multiyear, multiphase research and evaluation initiative supporting the health and well-being of vulnerable families. Specifically, we adopted a relational approach, intentionally and consistently focusing on building relationships, and a trauma-informed approach, highlighting safety across all levels. These innovative approaches have facilitated success in conducting safe, meaningful research and evaluation with community partners. Based on these approaches, we outline specific strategies and key considerations used in the context of the initiative, with the goal of encouraging others to adopt relational and trauma-informed methodological approaches and use these frameworks in research and evaluation efforts in applied settings.

Keywords

community-based research community-based evaluation relational approach trauma-informed approach

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

N. C. Z.

Motz

Pepler

D. J.

(2019). Developing and testing a readiness tool for violence prevention partnerships with community-based projects. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Andrews

N. C. Z.

Motz

Pepler

D. J.

Jeong

J. J.

Khoury

(2018). Engaging mothers with substance use issues and their children in early intervention: Understanding use of service and outcomes. Child Abuse and Neglect, 83, 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.06.011

Belone

Lucero

J. E.

Duran

Tafoya

Baker

E. A.

Chan

… Wallerstein

(2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: Community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 117–135. doi:10.1177/1049732314557084

Bliven

B. D.

Kaufman

S. E.

Spertus

J. A.

(2001). Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: Validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Quality of Life Research, 10, 15–22.

Brave Heart

M. Y. H.

DeBruyn

L. M.

(1998). The American Indian holocaust: Healing historical unresolved grief. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 8, 60–82. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5820/aian.0802.1998.60

Breaking the Cycle. (2014). Connections: A group intervention for mothers and children experiencing violence in relationships. Retrieved from http://mothercraft.ca/index.php?q=ei-connections

Campano

Ghiso

M. P.

Welch

B. J.

(2015). Ethical and professional norms in community-based research. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 29–49. doi:10.17763/haer.85.1.a34748522021115m

Chen

H. T.

(1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cousins

J. B.

Whitmore

Shulha

(2013). Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 7–22. doi:10.1177/1098214012464037

10.

Crooks

C. V.

Exner-Cortens

Siebold

Moore

Grassgreen

Owen

… Rosier

(2018). The role of relationships in collaborative partnership success: Lessons from the Alaska Fourth R project. Evaluation and Program Planning, 67, 97–104. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.12.007

11.

Drahota

Meza

R. D.

Brikho

Naaf

Estabillo

J. A.

Gomez

E. D.

… Aarons

G. A.

(2016). Community-academic partnerships: A systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. Milbank Quarterly, 94, 163–214. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12184

12.

Emerson

A. M.

Ramaswamy

(2015). Theories and assumptions that inform trauma-specific interventions for incarcerated women. Family and Community Health, 38, 240–251. doi:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000073

13.

Fetterman

Wandersman

(2007). Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 179–198. doi:10.1177/1098214007301350

14.

Granello

D. H.

Wheaton

J. E.

(2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 387–393. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00325.x

15.

Green

Daniel

Novick

(2001). Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research. Public Health Reports, 116, 20–31.

16.

Harkavy

Hartley

(2012). Integrating a commitment to the public good into the institutional fabric: Further lessons from the field. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16, 17–36.

17.

Janzen

Ochocka

Turner

Cook

Franklin

Deichert

(2017). Building a community-based culture of evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 163–170. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.08.014

18.

Jessell

Smith

Jemal

Windsor

(2016). Using technology to facilitate collaboration in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Journal of Technology in Human Services, 34, 241–255. doi:10.1080/15228835.2016.1186581

19.

Johnston

Woody

(2008). Ethical challenges in community-based research: Introduction to the series. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 15, 115–117. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00118.x

20.

Jordan

J. V.

Walker

Hartling

L. M.

(Eds.) (2004). The complexity of connection. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

21.

Kennedy

Vogel

Goldberg-Freeman

Kass

Farfel

(2009). Faculty perspectives on community-based research: “I see this still as a journey.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4, 3–16. doi:10.1525/jer.2009.4.2.3

22.

S. J.

Ford

J. D.

Kassam-Adams

Berkowitz

S. J.

Wilson

Wong

… Layne

C. M.

(2008). Creating trauma-informed systems: Child welfare, education, first responders, health care, juvenile justice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 396–404. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.39.4.396

23.

Kue

Thorburn

Keon

K. L.

(2015). Research challenges and lessons learned from conducting community-based research with the Hmong community. Health Promotion Practice, 16, 411–418. doi:10.1177/1524839914561515

24.

Leslie

Reynolds

Motz

Pepler

D. J.

(2016). Building connections: Supporting community-based programs to address interpersonal violence and child maltreatment. Toronto, Canada: Mothercraft Press.

25.

Motz

Leslie

Pepler

Moore

Freeman

(2006). Breaking the cycle: Measures of progress 1995-2005. Journal of FAS International, 4, 1–134.

26.

Noell

G. H.

Witt

J. C.

Gilbertson

D. N.

Ranier

D. D.

Freeland

J. T.

(1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 77–88. doi:10.1037/h0088949

27.

Patton

M. Q.

(1984). An alternative evaluation approach for the problem-solving training program: A utilization-focused evaluation process. Evaluation and Program Planning, 7, 189–192. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(84)90045-4

28.

Ragavan

M. I.

Thomas

Medzhitova

Brewer

Goodman

L. A.

Bair-Merritt

(2018). A systematic review of community-based research interventions for domestic violence survivors. Psychology of Violence. doi:10.1037/vio0000183

29.

Sabarre

(n.d.). Bridging the gap: Evaluation theory and practice. Retrieved from https://programs.online.american.edu/online-graduate-certificates/project-monitoring/resource/evaluation-theory-and-practice

30.

Savage

Quiros

Dodd

S. J.

Bonavota

(2007). Building trauma informed practice: Appreciating the impact of trauma in the lives of women with substance abuse and mental health problems. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 7, 117–138. doi:10.1300/J160v07n01

31.

Shulha

L. M.

Whitmore

Cousins

J. B.

Gilbert

al Hudib

(2016). Introducing evidence-based principles to guide collaborative approaches to evaluation: Results of an empirical process. American Journal of Evaluation, 37, 193–215. doi:10.1177/1098214015615230

32.

Stoecker

(2008). Challenging institutional barriers to community-based research. Action Research, 6, 49–67. doi:10.1177/1476750307083721

33.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. (HHS Publication No. [SMA] 14-4884). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

34.

Swartz

M. K.

(2010). Promoting research in practice settings. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 24, 69–70. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.12.001

35.

Thurman

S. K.

Berry

B. E.

(1992). Cocaine use: Implications for intervention with childbearing women and their infants. Child Health Care, 21, 31–38.

36.

Tomlin

A. A.

Hines

Sturn

(2016). Reflection in home visiting: The what, why, and a beginning step toward how. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27, 617–627. doi:10.1002/imhj

37.

Tomlin

A. A.

Weatherston

D. J.

Pavkov

(2014). Critical components of reflective supervision: Responses from expert supervisors in the field. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35, 70–80. doi:10.1002/imhj.21420

38.

Tourangeau

Smith

T. W.

(1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275–304. doi:10.1086/297751

39.

Walker

Rosen

W. B.

(Eds.). (2004). How connections heal: Stories from relational-cultural therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

40.

Wall

M. A.

Jenney

Walsh

(2018). Conducting evaluation research with children exposed to violence: How technological innovations in methodologies and data collection may enhance the process. Child Abuse and Neglect. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.01.007

41.

Wolf

Z. R.

Bailey

D. N.

Keeley

P. A.

(2014). Creation of a caring protocol: Activities and dissemination strategies in caring research and instruments. International Journal for Human Caring, 18, 66–82.

42.

Zuberi

Motz

Leslie

Pepler

D. J.

(2018). Building connections: Supporting the readiness and capacity of community-based projects to deliver a trauma-informed intervention. Zero to Three, 39, 21–26.