Youth participatory evaluation (YPE) engages young people in the evaluation process. Over the last 20 years, the field has emerged, but more work is needed as evaluators explore the potential for youth participation within their own evaluation practices. This article describes a practice-oriented matrix for visualizing and conceptualizing the role of young people in evaluation. In this article, we describe the matrix, provide examples from practice to illustrate its potential, and raise considerations for the field, including the role of adults in YPE, and the benefits and limitations for youth and for the evaluation process. We conclude with potential future directions of YPE for the field.
AnyonY.BenderK.KennedyH.DechantsJ. (2018). A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, youth outcomes and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 45, 865–878.
2.
ArnoldM. E.GiffordL. (2015) Youth advocates for health! Youth participatory action research curriculum. Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service.
3.
AshtonC. A.ArnoldM. E.WellsE. E. (2010). Participatory evaluation with youth leads to community action project. Journal of Extension[Online], 48, 3. Retrieved fromhttp://www.joe.org/joe/2010june/iw2.php
4.
CaminoL.ZeldinS.MookC.O’ConnorC. (2005). Youth and adults leaders for program excellence (YALPE). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Retrieved fromwww.actforyouth.net
5.
CheckowayB.Richards-SchusterK. (2003). Young people’s participation in research and evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 21–33.
6.
CheckowayB.DobbieD.Richards-SchusterK. (2003). Involving young people in community evaluation research. Community Youth Development, 4, 7–11.
7.
ChenP.WeissF.NicholsonH. (2010). Girls study girls Inc: Engaging girls in evaluation through participatory action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 228–237.
8.
ChenS.PolandB.SkinnerH. (2007). Youth voices: Evaluation of participatory action research. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 22, 125–150.
9.
CooperS. (2018). Participation evaluation in youth and community work: Theory and practice. London, England: Routledge.
10.
CostleyC.ElliottG.GibbsP. (2010). Doing work based research: Approaches to enquiry for insider-researchers. London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446287880
11.
CousinsJ. B.WhitmoreE. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5–23.
12.
DelgadoM. (2006). Designs and methods for youth-led research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
FettermanD.Rodríquez-CamposL.WandersmanA.O’SullivanR. (2014). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Building a strong conceptual foundation for stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation (A response to cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha, 2013). American Journal of Evaluation, 35, 144–148.
14.
FettermanD.WandersmanA. (2007). Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today & tomorrow. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 179–198.
15.
FineM.CammarotaJ. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. London, England: Routledge.
16.
FlemingJ. (2010). Young people’s involvement in research: Still a long way to go?Qualitative Social Work, 10, 207–223.
17.
Foster-FishmanP. G.LawK. M., LichtyL. F., & AounC. (2010). Youth ReACT for social change: A method for youth participatory action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 67–83.
18.
GoodyearL. K.CheckowayB. (Eds.). (2003). Youth engagement in community evaluation research [Special issue]. CYD Journal, 4, 1.
19.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
JacquezF.VaughnL.WagnerE. (2013). Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: A review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 176–189.
21.
JenningsL. B.Parra-MedinaD. M.Hilfinger-MessiasD. K.McLoughlinK. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 31–55.
22.
LernerR. M.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.LernerJ. V. (2005). Positive youth development a view of the issues. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 10–16.
23.
LondonJ.ZimmermanK.ErbsteinN. (2003). Youth-led research and evaluation: Tools for youth, organizational and community development. New Directions for Evaluation, 98, 33–45.
24.
OzerE. (2016). Youth-led participatory action research: Developmental and equity perspectives. In HornRuckLiben (Eds.), Equity and justice in developmental science: Theoretical and methodological issues. (Vol. 50, pp. 189–207). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
25.
OzerE.RittermanM.WanisM. (2010). Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: Opportunities, constraints, and key processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 152–166.
26.
PowersJ.TiffanyJ. (2006). Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 12, S79–S87.
27.
PritzkerS.LaChapelleA.TatumJ. (2012). “We need their help”: Encouraging and discouraging adolescent civic engagement through photovoice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2247–2254.
28.
Richards-SchusterK.Sabo FloresK.WhiteD.ArnoldM. (2015). Youth focused evaluation: Status of the field (Presidential Strand Selected Session). Chicago, IL: American Evaluation Association.
29.
Richards-SchusterK.TimmermansB. (2017). Conceptualizing the role of adults in youth social justice work: An example from practice. Children & Youth Service Review, 81, 284–292.
RoholtR.MuellerM. (2013). Youth advisory structures: Listening to young people to support quality youth services. New Directions for Youth Development, 139. doi:10.1002/yd.20070
32.
Sabo FloresK. (Ed.). (2003). Youth participatory evaluation: A field in the making. New Directions for Evaluation, 98. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
33.
Sabo FloresK. (2007). Youth participatory evaluation: Strategies for engaging young people. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
34.
Stanton-SalazarR. (2010). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43, 1066–1109.
35.
TeixeiraS. (2015). It seems like no one cares: Participatory photo mapping to understand youth perspectives on vacant property. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 390–414.
36.
ZeldinS.ChristensB.PowersJ. (2012). The psychology and practice of youth adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 385–397.
