Despite political and rhetorical pronouncements of a reduction in racism, growing inequity in U.S. society continues to feature race as a prominent fault line with no evidence of reduction on the horizon. Of significant concern is the degree to which inequity among racially identified subgroups of the population link to policies and practices of local, state, and federal government and thereby influence the operation and evaluation of important programs and services. Evaluation as a principal tool of knowledge creation on behalf of government and the public trust must examine its role with respect to these alarming trends and potential vulnerability. The author examines how race and racism (particularly as focused on African American communities) may influence the theories, models, practices, and techniques of evaluation and calls for creation of an ongoing forum in the American Journal of Evaluation where these critical issues can receive thoughtful and continuous attention from the field.
AllportG. (1950). The nature of prejudice. Political Psychology, 12, 125–157.
2.
American Evaluation Association. (2004). Cultural reading of the program evaluation standards (2nd ed.).
3.
American Evaluation Association. (2011). American evaluation association public statement on cultural competence in evaluation. Fairhaven, MA: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eval.org
4.
AndersonJ. D. (2004). Eleventh annual brown lecture in education research a long shadow: The American pursuit of political justice and education equality. Educational Researcher, 44, 319–335. doi:10.3102/0013189X15601427
5.
AndersonJ. D. (2007). Race-conscious educational policies versus a “Color-blind Constitution”: A historical perspective. Educational Researcher, 36, 249–257. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306534
6.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2014). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (4th ed.). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BrunerJ. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
8.
CaldwellL. (in press). How structural racism affects the evaluation field and the role of evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation.
9.
CarterP. L.SkibaR.ArredondoM. I.PollockM. (2017). You can’t fix what you don’t look at: Acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. Urban Education, 52, 207–235. doi:10.1177/0042085916660350
10.
CronbachL. J.Associates. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
DiAngeloR. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3, 54–70.
12.
DuBoisW. E. B. (1968). The autobiography of W.E.B. DuBois: A soliloquy on viewing my life from the last decade of its first century. New York, NY: International.
GarroL. C.MattinglyC. (2001). Narrative as construct and construction. In MattinglyC.GarroL. (Eds.), Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
HarrisL.FiskeS. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17, 847–853. Sage. on behalf of the Association for Psychological Science Stable. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40064466
16.
HelmsJ. E.JerniganM.MascherJ. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60, 27–36. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.27
17.
HilliardA. (1989). Kemetic (Egyptian) historical revision: Implications for cross-cultural evaluation and research in education. Evaluation Practice, 10, 7–23.
18.
HopsonR. K. (1999). Minority issues in evaluation revisited: Re-conceptualizing and creating opportunities for institutional change. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 445–451. doi:10.1177/109821409902000304
19.
HouseE. R. (1999). Evaluation and people of color—A response to professor Stanfield. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 433–435. doi:10.1177/109821409902000302
20.
HouseE. R. (2017). Evaluation and the framing of race. American Journal of Evaluation, 38, 167–189. doi:10.1177/1098214017694963
21.
KimbleJ. (2007). Insuring inequality: The role of the federal housing administration in the urban ghettoization of African Americans. Law & Social Inquiry, 32, 399–434.
22.
KirkhartK. (2005). Through a cultural lens: Reflections on validity and theory in evaluation. In HoodS.HopsonR. K.FriersonH. T. (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 21–39). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
23.
LewisD. L. (1993). W.E.B. DuBois biography of a race 1868–1919. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
24.
LichtensteinAl. (2018). Decolonizing the AHR. The American Historical Review, 123, xiv–xvii. doi:10.1093/ahr/123.1.xiv
25.
MagillF. (Ed.). (1992). Masterpieces of African American literature. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
26.
OmiM.WinantH. (1986). Racial formation in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
PattonM. Q. (1999). Some framing questions about racism and evaluation: Thoughts stimulated by professor John Stanfield’s “slipping through the front door: Relevant social scientific evaluation in the people of color century.”American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 437–443. doi:10.1177/109821409902000303
28.
PereaJ. F. (2014). Doctrines of delusion: How the history of the G.I. Bill and other inconvenient truths undermine the supreme courts affirmative action jurisprudence. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 75, 582–651.
29.
PettigrewT. F. (2005). The social science study of American race relations in the 20th century. In CrandallC. S.SchallerM. (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp.1–32.). Seattle, WA: Lewinian Press. Reprinted in Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2008, 2, 318–345.
30.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2005). Allport’s intergroup contact hypothesis: Its history and influence. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. P. (Eds.), Reflecting on the nature of prejudice (pp. 263–277). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
31.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York, NY: Liveright.
32.
StanfieldJ. H. (1999). Slipping through the front door: relevant social scientific evaluation in the people of color century. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 415–431. doi:10.1177/109821409902000301.
33.
TatumB. D. (1992). Talking about race, learning about racism: The application of racial identity development theory in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 1–24.
34.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity. Education & Society, 1, 1–40.
35.
WinantH. (2004). Dialectics of the veil. In WinantH.PoliticsT. N.PressM. (Eds.), The new politics of race: Globalism, difference, justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
WinterN. (2008). Dangerous frames: How ideas about race and gender shape public opinion. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved fromhttp://site.ebrary.com/id/10265930
37.
YancyG. (2018). Backlash: What happens when we talk honestly about racism in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
