ArendtH. (1963). Between past and future. New Haven, CT: Meridian Books.
2.
BravermanM. T. (2013). Negotiating measurement: Methodological and interpersonal considerations in the choice and interpretation instruments. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 99–114.
3.
BuckleyJ.ArchibaldT.HargravesM.TrochimW. M. (2015). Defining and teaching evaluative thinking: Insights from research on critical thinking. American Journal of Evaluation, 36, 375–388.
HoffmanA. J. (2015). How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford, CA: Stanford Briefs.
8.
HouseE. R. (1977). The logic of evaluative argument. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation (Vol. 7). Los Angeles: UCLA, Center for the Study of Education.
9.
HouseE. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
HouseE. R. (2014). Origins of the ideas in Evaluating with Validity. In GriffithJ. C.Montrosse-MoorheadB. (Eds.), Revisiting truth, beauty, and justice: Evaluating with validity in the 21st century. New Directions for Evaluation (Vol. 142, pp. 9–15).
RallisS. F. (2014). When and how qualitative methods provide credible and actionable evidence: Reasoning with rigor, probity, and transparency. In DonaldsonS. I.ChristieC. A.MarkM. M. (Eds.), Credible and actionable evidence: The foundation for rigorous and influential evaluations (pp. 137–155). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
14.
ScrivenM. (1976). Reasoning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
ScrivenM. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58.
16.
ScrivenM. (1995). The logic of evaluation and evaluation practice. In FournierD. M. (Ed.), Reasoning in evaluation: Inferential links and leaps. New Directions for Evaluation (Vol. 68, pp. 49–70).
17.
UNICEF. (2015). Unless we act now: The impact of climate change on children. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
18.
WeissC.BucuvalasM. (1980). Truth tests and utility tests: Decision makers’ frame of reference for social science research. American Sociological Review, 45, 302–313.
19.
WelzerH. (2017). Climate wars: Why people will be killed in the 21st century. Cambridge, England: Polity Press (paperback edition).