CookT. D. (1985). Post-positivist critical multiplism. In ShotlandR. L.MarkM. M. (Eds.), Social science and social policy (pp. 21–62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
CookT. D.GruderC. L. (1978). Metaevaluative research. Evaluation Quarterly, 2, 5–51.
5.
CookT. D.LevitonL. C.ShadishW. R. (1985). Program evaluation. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 699–777). New York, NY: Random House.
6.
CookT.MurphyR.HuntH. (2000). Comer’s school development program in Chicago: A theory-based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 535–597.
7.
CookT.PayneM. (2002). Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In MostellerF.BoruchR. (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 150–178). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8.
CookT. D.ReichardtC. S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
CronbachL. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CronbachL. J.AmbronS. R.DornbuschS. M.HessR. D.HornickR. C.PhillipsD. C.,… WeinerS. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
MackieJ. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
12.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.LevitonL. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.