Orbiting the Big Dog

American Evaluation Association. (2003, 11). American Evaluation Association response to U.S. Department of Education notice of proposed priority regarding scientifically based evaluation methods. Author. Retrieved from www.eval.org/doepage.htm

American Evaluation Association. (2011). Public statement on cultural competence in evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.eval.org/ccstatement.asp

Einstein A. (1916/1920). Relativity: The special and general theory ( Lawson R. W. trans.). New York, NY: Holt.

Fetterman D. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hawking S. (2001) The universe in a nutshell. New York, NY: Bantam.

Hawking S. Mlodinow L. (2010). The grand design. New York, NY: Bantam.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2011). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [earlier editions in 1988, 1994]

Kuhn T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lenin V. I. (1899/2004). The development of capitalism in Russia. Honolulu, HI: University Press of the Pacific.

Machiavelli N. (1532). De principatibus ([The prince], written 1513). Florence, IT: Giunta.

Marx K. (1867/1996). Das kapital (Capital: A critique of political economy). Chicago, IL: H. Regnery.

Patton M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patton M. Q. (2012). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rothman R. (1991, 9 4). NAEP board fires researchers critical of standards process. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/1991/09/04/01naep.h11.html

Sartre J. -P. (1944). Huis clos [ No exit ] (trans. Gilbert S. ). New York, NY: Vintage.

Sartre J. -P. (1960). A critique of dialectical reason: Volume 1, Theory of practical ensembles. Paris, FR: Éditions Gallimard.

Scriven M. (1998, 11). An evaluation dilemma: Change agent vs. analyst. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Chicago, IL.

Smith N. (1998). Professional reasons for declining an evaluation contract. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 177–190.

Stake R. E. (1986). Quieting reform: Social science and social action in an urban youth program. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Stufflebeam D. L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. American Journal of Evaluation, 15, 321–338.

Stufflebeam D. S. Patton M. Q. Fetterman D. Greene J. G. Scriven M. S. Mabry L. (2001, 11). Theories of action in program evaluation. Panel presentation at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, St. Louis, MO.

U.S. Department of Education. (2005, 1 25). Scientifically based evaluation methods (RIN 1890-ZA00). Federal Register, 70, 3586–3589.