Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Program evaluation is generally viewed as a set of mechanisms for collecting and using information to learn about projects, policies and programs, to understand their effects as well as the manner in which they are implemented. AEA has espoused principles for evaluation that place emphasis on competent, honest inquiry that respects the security, dignity and self-worth of respondents, program participants, clients, and other evaluation stakeholders. For community psychology, program evaluation is conceptualized as a strategy for effecting social change and promoting social justice. Examples of “evaluation as change strategy” are provided, with specific suggestions for how evaluators can increase the likelihood that evaluation efforts can lead to successful community changes.

Keywords

program evaluation community psychology change strategies evaluation as change strategy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Evaluation Association. (2004). American Evaluation Association guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved from http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51

American Evaluation Association. (2013a). About AEA. Retrieved September 4, 2014, from http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=4

American Evaluation Association. (2013b). Mission, vision, values and AEA policies. Retrieved September 4, 2014, from http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=13

Connell

C. M.

Lewis

R. K.

Cook

J. R.

Meissen

Johnson-Hakim

Anglin

… Taylor

(2013). Graduate training in community psychology practice competencies: Response to the 2012 survey of graduate programs in community psychology. The Community Psychologist, 46, 5–8.

Cousins

J. B.

Earl

L. M.

(1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397–418.

Dalton

Wolfe

(2012). Community psychology practice competencies. The Community Psychologist, 45, 7–14.

Fetterman

D. M.

Wandersman

(2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

Guba

E.G.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Greene

J. C.

(1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18, 25–35.

10.

Harnar

M. A.

(2014). Developing criteria to identify transformative participatory evaluators. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 10, 14–31.

11.

Macdonald

Walker

(1975) Case-study and the social philosophy of educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 5, 2–11.

12.

Mark

M. M.

Henry

G. T.

(2004). The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence. Evaluation, 10, 35–57.

13.

Mertens

D. M.

(2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1, 212–225. DOI: 10.1177/1558689807302811.

14.

Rallis

S. E.

Rossman

G. B.

(2000). Dialogue for learning: Evaluator as critical friend. New Directions for Evaluation, 86, 81–92.

15.

Schwandt

T. A.

(1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher, 18, 11–16.

16.

Schwandt

T. A.

(1992). Better living through evaluation? Images of progress shaping evaluation practice. Evaluation Practice, 12, 135–144.

17.

Society for Community Research and Action. (2014). Who we are. Retrieved September 4, 2014, from http://scra27.org/who-we-are/

Using Evaluation to Effect Social Change

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References