This essay explores the implications of the zeitgeist that emerged in the United States during the 1960s for the conceptualization of ethical issues in evaluation and community psychology, and how perspectives from the latter field might enhance ethical practice in the former. Special attention is paid to articulations of social justice, professional standards, and cultural competence, and how general exhortations for ethical, just behavior in evaluation can be translated into more specific, actionable analyses through the application of frameworks such as Prilleltensky’s “wellness as fairness” orientation and Kelly’s ecological model.
BennettC.AndersonL.CooperS.HassolL.KleinD.RosenblumG. (1966). Community psychology: A report of the Boston conference on the education of psychologists for community mental health. Boston, MA: Boston University.
3.
CousinsJ. B.WhitmoreE.ShulhaL. (2013). Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 7–22.
4.
DattaL. (1999). The ethics of evaluation neutrality and advocacy. In FitzpatrickJ.MorrisM. (Eds.), Current and emerging ethical challenges in evaluation(New Directions for Evaluation, No. 82, pp. 77–88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
FettermanD. M.WandersmanA. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
FitzpatrickJ. L.SandersJ. R.WorthenB. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
HouseE.HoweK. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
KellyJ. G. (2006). Becoming ecological: An expedition into community psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
KellyJ. G.RyanA. M.AltmanB. E.StelznerS. P. (2000). Understanding and changing social systems: An ecological view. In RappaportJ.SeidmanE. (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 133–160). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
12.
KloosB.HillJ.ThomasE.WandersmanA.EliasM. J.DaltonJ. H. (2012). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
LeacockE. B. (Ed.). (1971). The culture of poverty: A critique. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
14.
LewisO. (1969). The culture of poverty. In MoynihanD. P. (Ed.), On understanding poverty: Perspectives from the social sciences (pp. 187–200). New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
MorrisM. (1999). The case of the desperate staff. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 115.
16.
MorrisM. (2009). The fifth Guiding Principle: Beacon, banality, or Pandora’s Box?American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 220–224.
17.
MorrisM.WilliamsonJ. B. (1982). Stereotypes and social class: A focus on poverty. In MillerA. G. (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 411–465). New York, NY: Praeger.
18.
NeeD.MojicaM. I. (1999). Ethical challenges in evaluation with communities: A manager’s perspective. In FitzpatrickJ.MorrisM. (Eds.), Current and emerging ethical challenges in evaluation(New Directions for Evaluation, No. 82, pp. 35–45). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
PrilleltenskyI. (2012). Wellness as fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49, 1–21.
20.
RossiP. H.LipseyM. W.FreemanH. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
RyanW. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
22.
SchwandtT. A. (2007). On the importance of revisiting the study of ethics in evaluation. In KushnerS.NorrisN. (Eds.), Dilemmas of engagement: Evaluation development under new public management and the new politics (pp. 117–127). New York, NY: Elsevier.
ValentineC. A. (1978). Culture and poverty: Critique and counterproposals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
WeissC. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
WhitmoreE. (Ed.). (1998). Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation(New Directions for Evaluation, No. 80). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
YarbroughD. B.ShulhaL. M.HopsonR. K.CaruthersF. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
