Monitoring and Evaluation of African Women in Agricultural Research and Development (AWARD)

Abstract

Keywords

development evaluation monitoring and evaluation Africa women in agriculture theory of change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

African Women in Agricultural Research and Development. (2009). Sowing success: Results report 2008/09. Retrieved from http://www.awardfellowships.org/about-us/results-report-200809.html

African Women in Agricultural Research and Development. (2010). The theory of change of AWARD. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.

African Women in Agricultural Research and Development. (2012). Summary of AWARD’s M&E system. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.

African Women in Agricultural Research and Development. (2013). AWARD in the news. Retrieved from http://awardfellowships.org/media/award-in-the-news.html

Beintema

N. M.

Di Marcantonio

. (2010). Female participation in African agricultural research and higher education: New insights (International Food Policy Research Institute Discussion Paper 00957). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute/African Women in Agricultural Research and Development.

Center for Creative Leadership. (2007). The handbook of leadership development evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2011). The state of food and agriculture women in agriculture: Closing the gender gap for development. Retrieved form http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i2050e/i2050e00.htm

Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa. (2006). Framework for African agricultural productivity/Cadre pour la productivité agricole en Afrique. Accra, Ghana: Author.

Guijt

Woodhill

(2002). Managing for impact in rural development: A guide for project M & E. Rome, Italy: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

10.

Hummelbrunner

(2010). Beyond logframe: Critique, variations and alternatives. In Fujita

(Ed.), Beyond logframe; Using systems concepts in evaluation (pp. 1–34). Tokyo, Japan: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development.

11.

Mayne

. (2011). Contribution analysis: Addressing cause and effect. In Schwartz

Forss

Marra

(Eds.), Evaluating the complex (pp. 53–96). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

12.

Pawson

Tilley

, (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, England: Sage.

13.

Rowlands

(1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxford, England: Oxfam.

14.

Solava

Alkire

(2007). Agency and empowerment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. OPHI Working Paper. Oxford, England: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.

15.

Stern

Stame

Mayne

Forss

Davies

Befani

. (2012). Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations (Department for International Development Working Paper 38). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67427/design-method-impact-eval.pdf

16.

The World Bank. (2009). Gender in agriculture sourcebook. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

VeneKlasen

Miller

(2007). A new weave of power, people & politics: The action guide for advocacy and citizen participation. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

18.

White

Phillips

. (2012). Addressing attribution of cause and effect in small n impact evaluations: Towards an integrated framework (Working Paper 15). New Delhi, India: Global Development Network, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.3ieimpact.org/media/filer/2012/06/29/working_paper_15.pdf