The 4-H youth development organization is a complex public–private partnership between the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the nation’s Cooperative Extension system and National 4-H Council, a private, nonprofit partner. The current article is focused on a partnership approach to the evaluation of a national 4-H Science initiative that engaged both internal and external evaluators as well as key stakeholders. While external evaluators are valued for their relative lack of bias and independence, internal evaluation has been the predominant strategy used by the Cooperative Extension system. For this evaluation, we adopted a hybrid approach that teamed an external evaluation firm with a team of internal evaluators and key stakeholders. We discuss specific strategies and approaches that we developed to implement this approach in the 4-H youth development organization and offer suggestions for how it might be useful in other complex, multipartner organizations.
American Evaluation Association. (2010). An evaluation road map for a more effective government. Fairhaven, MA: Author.
2.
AyersT. (1987). Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A Stakeholder-collaborative approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 263–271.
3.
BravermanM. T.ArnoldM. E. (2008). An evaluator's balancing act: Making decisions about methodological rigor. In BravermanM. T.EngleM.ArnoldM. E.RennekampR. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from cooperative extension. New Directions for Evaluation (Vol. 120, pp. 71–86).
4.
CartlandJ.Ruch-RossH. S.DonohueW. (2008). Role sharing between evaluators and stakeholders in practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 460–477.
5.
Conley-TylerM. (2005). A fundamental choice: Internal or external evaluation?Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 4, 3–11.
6.
ConnerR. F. (2004). Developing and implementing culturally competent evaluation: A discussion of multicultural validty in two HIV prevention programs for Latinos. In Thompson-RobinsonM.HopsonR.SenGuptaS. (Eds.), In Search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 51–65.
7.
CousinsJ. B.WhitmoreE. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In WhitmoreE. (Ed.), New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5–23.
8.
DuttweilerM. (2008). The value of evaluation in Cooperative Extension. In BravermanM. T.EngleM.ArnoldM. E.RennekampR. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from cooperative extension. New Directions for Evaluation, 120, 87–100.
9.
FranzN.TownsonL. (2008). The nature of complex organizations: The case of cooperative extension. In BravermanM. T.EngleM.ArnoldM. E.RennekampR. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from cooperative extension. New Directions for Evaluation120, 5–14.
10.
LamburM. (2008). Organizational structures that support internal program evaluation. In BravemanM. T.EngleM.ArnoldM. E.RennekampR. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from cooperative extension. New Directions for Evaluation, 120, 41–54.
11.
LoveA. J. (1983). The organizational context and the development of internal evaluation. In LoveA. J. (Ed.), New Directions for Program Evaluation, 20, 5–22.
12.
MathisonS. (1994). Rethinking the evaluator role: Partnerships between organizations and evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 299–304.
13.
MathisonS. (2011). Internal evaluation, historically speaking. In VolkovB.BaronM. E. (Eds.), Internal evaluation in the 21st century. New Directions for Evaluation, 132, 13–23.
14.
MielkeM.ButlerA.LaFleurJ. (2009). 4-H Science, Engineering, and Technology (SET) initiative: Enrollment and implementation study. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
RileyD.ButlerA. (2012). Priming the pipeline: Lessons from promising 4-H science programs. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
18.
RossiP. H.LipseyM. W.FreemanH. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
ScrivenM. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
SenGuptaS.HopsonR.Thompson-RobinsonM. (2004). Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview. In Thompson-RobinsonM.HopsonR.SenGuptaS. (Eds.), In search of cultural competence in evaluation: Toward principles and practices. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 5–19).
VolkovB. B. (2011). Internal evaluation a quarter-century later: A conversation with Arnold J. Love. In VolkovB. B.BaronM. E. (Eds.), Internal evaluation in the 21st century. New Directions for Evaluation132, 5–12.
