The Labin et al. logic model describes the why, how, what, and potential outcomes of evaluation capacity building (ECB). Getting To Outcomes offers a frame and empirical results for operationalizing the ECB logic model of Labin et al. and for deepening the science and practice of ECB.
ChinmanM.AcostaJ.EbenerP.BurkhartQ.CliffordM.CorselloM.,…Tellet-RoyceN. (2013). Intervening with practitioners to improve the quality of prevention: One year findings from a randomized trial of assets-getting to outcomes. Journal of Primary Prevention, 34, 173–191.
2.
ChinmanM.HunterS. B.EbenerP.PaddockS. M.StillmanL.ImmP.WandersmanA. (2008). The getting to outcomes demonstration and evaluation: An illustration of the prevention support system. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 206–224.
3.
ChinmanM.ImmP.WandersmanA. (2004). Getting to outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation. (No. TRTR101). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved fromhttp://www.rand.org/publications/TR/TR101/
4.
ChinmanM.TremainB.ImmP.WandersmanA. (2009) Strengthening prevention performance using technology: A formative evaluation of interactive getting to outcomes. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79, 469–481.
5.
FettermanD.WandersmanA. (2005) Empowerment evaluation: Principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
FisherD.ImmP.ChinmanM.WandersmanA. (2006) Getting to outcomes with developmental assets. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
HannahG.McCarthyS.ChinmanM. (2011). Getting to Outcomes in services for homeless Veterans: 10 steps for achieving accountability. Philadelphia, PA: National Center on Homelessness Among Veterans. Retrieved fromhttp://www.va.gov/HOMELESS/NationalCenter_Additional_Information.asp
9.
ImmP.ChinmanM.WandersmanA.RosenbloomD.GuckenburgS.LeisR. (2007). RAND, TR-403-SAMHSA. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved fromwww.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR403/ (available for free)
10.
LabinS.DuffyJ.MeyersD.WandersmanA.LesesneC. (2012) A research synthesis of the evaluation capacity building literature. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 307–338.
11.
LesesneC. A.LewisK. M.MooreC.FisherD.GreenD.WandersmanA. (2007, 2012). Promoting science-based approaches to teen pregnancy prevention using getting to outcomes: Draft 2007. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
12.
LesesneC. A.LewisK. M. WhiteC.P.GreenD.DuffyJ.WandersmanA. (2008). Promoting science-based approaches to teen pregnancy prevention: Proactively engaging the three systems of the interactive systems framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 379–392.
13.
PreskillH.BoyleS. (2008). A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 443–459.
14.
Taylor-RitzlerT.Suarez-BalcazarY.Garcia-IriarteE.HenryD. B.BalcazarF. E. (2013). Understanding and measuring evaluation capacity: A model and instrument validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 190–206.
15.
WandersmanA.ChienV.KatzJ. (2012). Toward an evidence–based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: Tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 445–460.
16.
WandersmanA.ImmP.ChinmanM.KaftarianS. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and program planning, 23, 389–395.
17.
WandersmanA.Snell-JohnsJ.LentzB.FettermanD.KeenerD.LivetM.…FlaspohlerP. (2005) The principles of empowerment evaluation. In
FettermanD.WandersmanA. (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 27–41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
